Search for: "State v. Favors" Results 8781 - 8800 of 37,550
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2019, 8:29 am by Richard Hunt
June 7, 2019) is not quite as favorable as that in Smith v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:18 am by Burton A. Padove
Although the Indiana Department of Transportation (DOT) declined to install a traffic signal at an intersection, possibly playing a role in a fatal car accident that later occurred at the site, the state appellate court affirmed summary judgment in favor of the agency. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 7:32 am
But I also believe, and it's personal -- and I was actually very -- it was hurtful to hear you talk about the reputations of two United States senators who built their reputations and career on the segregation of race in this country. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 8:24 am by Kent Scheidegger
California (one of Justice Brennan's very few significant opinions favoring the prosecution) and its 2013 holding Missouri v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 7:56 am by Russell Spivak, Benjamin Wittes
Code, entitled “Assistance to foreign and international tribunals and to litigants before such tribunals,” is, in Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s words in Intel v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 6:07 am by Mark Brennan and Arpan Sura
On June 20, 2019, the Supreme Court released its long-awaited decision in PDR v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Thomas Merrill
This imports the sequencing familiar in the Chevron context from United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d 1044, the court opined that when reviewing an administrative determination rendered after a hearing that is required by law, the court's standard is whether the determination "is, on the entire record, supported by substantial evidence" which is a "minimal standard ... demand[ing] only that a given inference is reasonable and plausible, not necessarily the most probable. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
” In United States v. [read post]