Search for: "State v. Long."
Results 8781 - 8800
of 51,514
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2010, 11:13 am
[Post by Venkat] Kleffman v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 10:00 pm
Today there are 153 states parties; the United States is not among them.... 2005, in Roper v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:20 pm
Douglas Laycock has long argued), there is little incentive to compromise. [read post]
19 May 2011, 2:29 pm
By Eric Goldman Young v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 10:41 am
The Court relied on Atwater v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 2:30 am
In view of the interest in this ruling by State Supreme Court Judge Joan B. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 4:11 pm
Summary dismissal of a suit charging discrimination based on sex and religion for failure to state a claim.Village of Bensenville v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 2:30 am
In view of the interest in this ruling by State Supreme Court Judge Joan B. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:30 pm
Based on an earlier Ninth Circuit decision, Pallas v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:22 pm
In United States of America v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:52 am
He should have fired back that the nonsense McAuliffe and his Democrats were peddling would actually have been unconstitutional under the long established Supreme Court precedent of Griswold v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 7:02 pm
Second, there were long-term purchase orders. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 11:14 am
(See Arizona v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 8:05 am
United States and Koontz v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:32 pm
Generally speaking, estoppel cannot be used against a state or municipal government (see e.g., New York State Medical Transporters Association v. [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 9:21 am
Reynolds Tobacco v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 12:41 pm
Robbins and Bowles v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 12:51 pm
Under Michigan v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 9:09 pm
[Post by Venkat] Abbas v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 5:26 pm
Although there is a long road ahead in terms of implementation, which will be peppered with contentious debates about the role of the state in the regulation of sex work and the legitimacy of sex work as labour, it is important to pause and look at the decision with a critical lens, taking into account the symbolic significance of this landmark case. [read post]
