Search for: "State v. Word" Results 8781 - 8800 of 40,667
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2016, 1:23 pm by Alex Loomis
In other words, the Chief Justice applied only the first two Baker factors, though he did not say anything about the legal relevance (or irrelevance) of the other four factors. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 9:14 am by Kingsley
Due to these concerns including the ones raised by the media (see here, here and here), INEC issued a press release which was also reported here and here, stating  its own position on the judgment. [read post]
18 May 2007, 10:38 am
According to a unanimous Supreme Court in Newman v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 5:38 am
Accordingly, it stated that the claim covered use of a magnesium salt of esomeprazole with an optical purity of ? [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 1:27 pm
That was one of the issues that Justice Murphy of the Nova Scotia Supreme Court had to decide in the recent case of Johansson et al v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 3:25 pm by Giles Peaker
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Carmichael and Sefton BC (HB) [2017] UKUT 0174 (AAC) Oh my. [read post]