Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 8781 - 8800
of 16,401
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2014, 7:35 am
Back in May we discussed ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 2:31 pm
The backlash against the Supreme Court’s decision in Kelo v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 8:03 am
Because flourishing theories give us strong defaults, they can say “protect critical uses” and “protect noncommercial uses” and move on.http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default? [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
The strong presumption of commercial speech when speech meets all three Bolger factors is typically not present for native content. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 6:55 am
Jane shared the government’s response-and-reply brief in Klayman v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 4:54 pm
Legislative enactments are imbued with a strong presumption of constitutionality and will not be held unconstitutional unless the party asserting such argument meets its heavy burden of proving the infirmity beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 3:25 pm
The Texas case, Deleon v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 10:21 am
” State v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:00 am
See Homestore, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 3:34 am
Although the driver's license has been revoked, he may still have a strong chance of succeeding at his criminal trial with the discrepancies between the video evidence and officer testimony pointed out by the trial court in State of Florida, Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 11:24 pm
The California Supreme Court in Edwards v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 6:01 am
Here’s a classic statement of the principle, from Shannon v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 1:10 pm
Liu v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 10:58 am
In his paper, Professor Rau discusses the effect the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in BG Group v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 9:02 am
In the most recent controversy, Levitt v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:45 am
In Bluman v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 7:05 am
Failure of a deed to clearly specify what constitutes (or what does not constitute) “reasonable surface right privileges” in a reservation of mineral rights, for example, resulted in a dispute recently decided by the Ohio Supreme Court (in Snyder v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
Berwick v. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 8:20 pm
S. 633 (2010) (quoting, for its current relevance, statement in United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
Beyond these two strands, we were introduced to the great modern structures of law making in the United States. [read post]
