Search for: "Bills v. State"
Results 8801 - 8820
of 21,861
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2016, 6:45 am
In National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 5:55 am
Ferguson and Buck v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 10:51 am
Recall that the Obama Administration refused to defend the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 8:54 am
The Amdocs v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 7:54 am
In a November 15 appearance at the Hill Center in Washington, interviewer Bill Press asked Justice Sonia Sotomayor whether she felt apprehensive about last Tuesday’s result. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
Footnote 2 in Stewart states: Consistent with its statutory purpose, the Sheriff's resort to Civil Service Law §71 was presumably 'to secure a steady, reliable, and adequate work force' (Matter of Duncan v New York State Dev. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 10:58 am
Krishnan v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 10:58 am
Krishnan v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 8:56 am
Breyer This remark was expounded at the Supreme Court earlier this month during a hearing in relation to Star Athletica L.L.C v Varsity Brands, Inc., et al.. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
Pennsylvania may have gone mysteriously red in the dark of election night, but a federal judge in that state has just ruled that Title VII prohibits sexual orientation discrimination. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:04 am
By Maria Kendrick The much awaited High Court judgment of 3 November 20161)R Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). was an historical decision which saw the Executive’s use of prerogative powers delineated in the context of Treaty making, and unmaking, in a successful Judicial Review against the Government. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in the case of David v Gabriel [2016] EWHC 2799 (QB)) -although, somewhat curiously, the judgment states it was handed down on 1 November 2016. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 3:00 pm
In Munoz v. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 11:19 am
Amdocs v. [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 12:18 pm
Note also that, in a narrow network, if you have a surgery, it's possible out-of-network physicians or other personnel may attend, and you could be on the hook for the whole amount they charge--unless your state has a "no surprise billing" law.Neoliberal market designers love the kaleidoscopic complexity of Obamacare. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 9:31 am
Facts: This case (United States of America v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 7:57 am
Plaintiff’s medical bills exceeded $175,000. [read post]
