Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office" Results 8801 - 8820 of 13,916
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2015, 7:24 pm
Probate Lawyers said the question presented on this record is whether the trusts created by the will of CMR, dated June 27, 1867, are valid within the law of perpetuities, or are void for remoteness. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 8:45 pm
Although the first prong of this two-prong test is not labeled as such, it is essentially the same type of inquiry as the "predominant purpose/secondary effects" test enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in City of Renton v. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 12:00 pm
Relying on Balbuena v IDR Realty LLC, the defendants contend that, because the plaintiff, an undocumented alien who is ineligible for employment in this country, submitted false documentation when he was hired by City Wide, he was not entitled to any damages for lost wages. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 2:25 pm by Evan Schwartz
  In one case, a payroll administrator transferred money out and was authorized to do so, but that same payroll administrator embezzled the funds. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 9:33 am by Aaron L. Nielson
This in an important case about the First Amendment and employees of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts.) [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 6:00 am
District Court in Los Angeles that Toyota did not heed his urging to disclose all evidence useful for rollover suits or for the National Highway Trade Traffic Safety Administration regulations. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:08 am
Some days ago, the General Court (GC) gave its assessment in another striking stripe case. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 3:52 am
Whether the Supreme Court’s decision last week in Safford Unified School District v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 10:00 am by Comitz Beethe
Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division, Fact Sheet #17C: Exception for Administrative Employees Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). [3] Loomis v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 9:09 am by Eric Goldman
The court says one officer’s comments were on public matters, and the other on private matters. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:44 pm
The following are passages from Military Judge Captain Allred's recent findings of fact in US v. [read post]