Search for: "Does 1 through 5" Results 8801 - 8820 of 24,668
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2012, 9:18 am by Ken
Some judges see through this and don't care for it. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 11:00 am
  Therefore, (1) automatic denial of statutory damages under HRS §101-27 in Condemnation 1 is vacated and the case remanded for a determination of damages, (2) the court's conclusion that Condemnation 2 was not abated by Condemnation 2 is vacated and the case remanded for a determination of whether the public purpose asserted in Condemnation 2 was pretextual.Slip op. at 5. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 6:51 am by Dore Louis
The State is preliminarily enjoined from enforcing § 790.338(1), (2), (5), and (6). [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:54 pm by emp
If the Privacy Commissioner’s SWIFT decision is considered analogous then it’s likely the requirements of 5(3) and 7(3)(c.1) would be met. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 1:26 am by Nicole Kellner-Swick
”[11] “Each credit union’s CUSO investment risk is less than 1% of its assets. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm by NL
While acknowledging the principle, upheld in Allen v Gulf Oil Refining Ltd [1979] 1 QB 156, that a locality may have some inevitable nuisance from an activity previously allowed or permitted in law, “r this does not mean that the mere fact that houses have been built around the boundary of the sewage treatment works at Mogden means that odour from the sewage treatment works cannot be a nuisance. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm by NL
While acknowledging the principle, upheld in Allen v Gulf Oil Refining Ltd [1979] 1 QB 156, that a locality may have some inevitable nuisance from an activity previously allowed or permitted in law, “r this does not mean that the mere fact that houses have been built around the boundary of the sewage treatment works at Mogden means that odour from the sewage treatment works cannot be a nuisance. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:52 am by jkissoon
 Failure to respond to the divorce paperwork does not stop the divorce that was put into motion by the Petitioner. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017)… [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 8:04 am by Alex Phipps
Considering (1), the court explained it was error under State v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
' | The IPKat—the new features just keep on coming | Book review: Art and Modern Copyright – the Contested Image Never Too Late 221 [Week ending 5 May] Book review: Competition Law and Intellectual Property in China | Assigned or not assigned? [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 2:41 pm by Chuck Cosson
Certain features of private, personal networked information tools contribute to moral hazard risks: 1) Solipsistic interfaces. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 9:13 am
Well, our county includes 5 different courthouses in two different towns. [read post]