Search for: "In re Reader"
Results 8801 - 8820
of 29,722
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2012, 9:31 am
Proposed change (section 941 of McKeon’s bill in re NDAA FY’13, same as section 962 of the HASC bill last year): SEC. 954. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:18 am
See In re Warfarin Sodium Antitrust Litig., 391 F.3d 516, 529 (3d Cir. 2004). [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 6:36 am
Readers will recall that last spring the Board withdrew three reports funded by copyright groups after admitting that the reports contained plagiarized passages. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:35 am
And while in truth, Boroson’s article makes that case, Boroson does a far greater disservice by advising readers to “avoid solo practitioners” when hiring lawyers. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 5:43 am
One of the things I do each morning is to look through my google reader account to see the new updates regarding nursing home news and information. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 5:32 am
This week, when it seemed that the House was prepared to vote on the bill, it was re-referred to committee to address “concerns. [read post]
9 May 2011, 10:10 am
Just a few years ago, Texas waiting lists for competency restoration reached crisis levels and they're pretty much back to that point now, even before the coming budget cuts. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:24 am
They’re right about this. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
("In re Bose did not change the consequences of fraud, when it is proved. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 9:17 pm
By now, many readers of this blog know that the U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 8:24 pm
Readers also know of my distrust of the nursing home industry in general, though I do allow for exceptions, as there are some good nursing home providers out there. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 1:13 pm
But I'm glad we're here, right now. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 7:18 am
As regular readers know, there is nothing I like more than being able to create a post straight from what goes into my email box. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 4:17 am
Regular readers of the Friday Funny know I make a point to not go for the same gag twice in two weeks. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 4:26 am
DA--I think that you're done. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 5:27 pm
FROM A READER: "What is going on with the proposed section 7 regs? [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 5:09 am
What about the EU, you're asking? [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 8:32 pm
In many cases, you're probably out of luck. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:00 pm
Chosen by you, our loyal readers, based on your clicks. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
Many thanks to the multiple readers who emailed me about a new federal standing decision, Webb v. [read post]
