Search for: "People v. Case"
Results 8801 - 8820
of 51,432
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2013, 11:50 am
September 10 | Laurie Ristino | The Method(s) Behind our Madness October 8 | Zygmunt Plater |Lies, Damn Lies, and Tellico Dam: The True Story Behind the Landmark Case of TVA v Hill October 22 | Laurie Beyranevand |Generally Recognized as Safe? [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 7:44 pm
Roe v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:32 am
” The Daily Journal offers a podcast featuring a discussion of “the case’s most salient constitutional points” by four people whose organizations filed amicus briefs in the case. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 7:36 am
According to court documents in Carmon-Rogers v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 7:14 am
Cramer v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 11:46 am
People v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 1:18 am
People v. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 8:21 am
The answer is four years.The case is Vega-Ruiz v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 5:45 pm
MediaSentry's statements in Michigan administrative case contradicted by prior statements in UMG v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 8:59 pm
History was made on June 26, 2020, in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision in R. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 12:30 pm
The case wound its way through the courts and the Supreme Court issued its decision on June 29, 2009. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 11:58 am
People v. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 12:14 pm
Recall that we noted in the last post that presumptions may not be invoked where the underlying facts needed to support them are not present (see People v Zekaj, 191 AD2d 663 [2nd Dept 1993]; People v Wilt, 105 AD2d 1089 [4th Dept 1984]). [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 12:14 pm
Recall that we noted in the last post that presumptions may not be invoked where the underlying facts needed to support them are not present (see People v Zekaj, 191 AD2d 663 [2nd Dept 1993]; People v Wilt, 105 AD2d 1089 [4th Dept 1984]). [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:52 am
In his dissent in Montana v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 12:27 pm
The latest foray by federal courts into the anachronistic (and often bizarre) legal analysis of who qualifies as an “Indian” comes from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in its decision in the case of United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 2:50 am
A New York Appellate Court has ruled in Patterson v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:00 am
" Justice Stevens wrote the court's opinion barring the death penalty for mentally retarded people as cruel and unusual punishment (link to Atkins v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:56 am
(Eugene Volokh) The case is Fox Television, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 3:08 am
The room also had mirrors, so he had to expect people would be watching, too. [read post]
