Search for: "People v. Tooks" Results 8801 - 8820 of 12,220
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2012, 9:34 am
The AmeriKat in full sheep get-up ready to bleat on about the Scrutiny Committee Over a glass of wine after the AIPPI Seminar on HGS v Eli Lily  this past November (see post on case here), the AmeriKat could be heard bleating about the importance of the UK’s Parliament European Scrutiny Committee’s interest in the proposed unitary patent system to anyone who would listen to her – which was about 3 people. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by Steve Lombardi
No. 09–0724 CEDAR RAPIDS COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT and EMC INSURANCE COMPANIES v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
  The assessment of damages hearing took place on 24 November 2011 in Mr Turrell’s absence. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 3:35 am by SHG
A few days ago, the New York Times had an insipid editorial deriding the failure of prosecutors to honor their obligation to disclose exculpatory evidence pursuant to Brady v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:01 am by Adam Wagner
The words “that was applicable” were analysed by the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) in Regina v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 6:48 pm by Mary Whisner
And now people can find online not only the confession but an interview with Nga Truong, reflecting on the interrogation three years later. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 4:02 am by Rita Handrich
Gunaydin, G., Zayas, V., Selcuk, E., & Hazan, C. (2012). [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
” Barlow’s letter encapsulated the reasoning behind the idea of copyright as an incentive to promote knowledge: literary and intellectual works took a considerable amount of time and resources to produce, and given the great public benefits that flow from them, some way of encouraging people to devote their time and resources to producing them was needed. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Forty-five years ago, the baseball world trained its attention on the Wisconsin Supreme Court and its impending decision in the case of Wisconsin v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 4:47 pm
The Court of Appeals of New York (New York State's top court) took up this exact legal question in People v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
The Counterargument of Judges Brown and Kavanaugh In a 2010 case, al-Bihani v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm by Marty Lederman
The Counterargument of Judges Brown and Kavanaugh In a 2010 case, al-Bihani v. [read post]