Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 8801 - 8820
of 178,509
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2016, 10:08 am
"The risk that [the plaintiff's child] would be subject to another such search is no more 'actual and imminent' than the Chicago Cubs (or, we fear, the Cleveland Indians) winning the World Series. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 5:02 pm
Generally, a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case must prove not only that the defendant was negligent but also that the defendant’s actions caused the plaintiff’s harm. [read post]
1 May 2010, 8:33 am
ABC HOTEL IS NOT LIABLE FOR PLAINTIFF'S FALL OR HER INJURY ABC Hotel Owed No Duty To Warn Plaintiff Of The Location Of Her And Her Companion's Luggage In The Hotel Suite The duty to warn extends only to those conditions (1) which are dangerous and (2) which the defendant created or which the defendant had control over and sufficient notice in advance of any accident. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 6:16 am
The protective order was sought by plaintiffs after another employee of Bland Farms, who was not a named plaintiff or potential class member, traveled to Mexico at his employer's direction and met with at least 2 plaintiffs in person at their homes in Mexico. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
In the testimony at issue, the Plaintiff's medical expert stated during his testimony that jurors “can see” with their own eyes the Plaintiff’s injury in the medical imaging. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:10 am
But because the Act's medical exemptions further the State's interest in a way a religious exemption would not, permitting plaintiffs to proceed to discovery would require more of the State than what the Supreme Court has prescribed.Judge Bianco dissented in part, saying in part:Notwithstanding these many fact-intensive questions regarding whether this law satisfies the general applicability requirement under Smith, the majority opinion closes the courthouse… [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 4:00 am
Plaintiff's refusal was based on religious objections and he claimed the employer's denial of his request for a religious exemption violated Title VII, the Michigan Elliot-Larsen Civil Rights Act, the Free Exercise Clause and the Michigan Constitution. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 4:05 am
Plaintiffs had argued that by failing to include annotations to federal cases that would indicate that Idaho's statute is unconstitutional, the publishers violated plaintiffs' due process rights.Los Angeles Blade reports on the decision. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 7:09 am
Following a jury trial, the court denied plaintiff's motion for judgment as a matter of law that its patent was not obvious and rejected plaintiff's argument that it should have been permitted to present the dollar amount of its license with a patent aggregator as a secondary consideration of nonobviousness. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 9:29 am
At trial, the plaintiff called the park’s director of operations as a witness. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 1:34 pm
Plaintiff's official photograph from Harris County Jail shows two officers placing their hands on the front and back of Plaintiff's neck as he continues to smile. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 11:09 am
’ Torrent users allegedly swarm plaintiff’s films, that is to say many users each host a piece of a large file, such as a movie, and together, make up a swarm that users access to view the movie. [read post]
12 May 2010, 3:25 am
Thus, Texas law does not permit a plaintiff who ingested another manufacturer's drug to maintain a failure-to-warn claim against a brand-name manufacturer. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 10:01 pm
The court in this case found there was no evidence defendant was going to sell off plaintiff’s equipment. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 3:03 pm
You will be pleased to know that the plaintiff who accuses Rick Springfield of assaulting her with his butt has not given up despite an earlier mistrial. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 4:54 pm
Accordingly, the court denied the Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
The court also rejected the Plaintiff’s argument that the carrier’s bad faith was evidenced by its assertion in the UIM case that the Plaintiff was partially responsible for the accident. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 11:25 pm
Defendant's motion to amend its answer to include inequitable conduct was denied. [read post]
17 May 2016, 2:14 pm
Robins, ruling that a plaintiff must sufficiently allege an injury that is both concrete and particularized in order to have Article III standing, and further that a “bare procedural violation” of a plaintiff’s statutory right may not be sufficiently “concrete” under this analysis. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
The Court emphasized that the term "animus" is vague and should not be used in disability discrimination cases with "direct evidence that the employer’s motive for taking an adverse employment decision was the plaintiff’s actual or perceived disability. [read post]
