Search for: "Sell v. Sell" Results 8801 - 8820 of 23,640
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2016, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
That’s where the imbalance comes: relatively manageable cost of doing business v. creation side is being killed by piracy and dealing w/great burdens from §512 to little effect. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 JC: give us more of flavor of how much of your takedown effort is automated v. human and what interaction is? [read post]
2 May 2016, 11:26 am by Lyle Denniston
  In the case raising that issue (Star Athletica v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 3:15 am
Mini Melts, Inc. v Reckitt Benckiser LLC, Opposition No. 91173963 (April 27, 2016) [precedential].Likelihood of Confusion: Not surprisingly, the Board found the marks to be virtually identical, and therefore this first du Pont factor weighed heavily in opposer's favor. [read post]
1 May 2016, 12:08 am
In that case, Lewison LJ agreed with Kitchin LJ’s reliance on an Australian case, Dart Industries Inc v Décor Corp Pty Limited [1994] FSR 567, in which the court had held that “… where a defendant has foregone the opportunity to manufacture and sell alternative products it will ordinarily be appropriate to attribute to the infringing product a proportion of the general overheads which would have sustained the opportunity. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  More specifically, California state courts as well as federal courts in the Ninth Circuit have concluded (in light of Luther v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:39 am by Patricia Salkin
Almeida v Arruda, 89 Mass App Ct 241, 241-48 (MA App. 3/18/2016)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Non-Conforming Uses, Uncategorized [read post]