Search for: "Sides v. Beene" Results 8801 - 8820 of 25,503
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2017, 3:17 am by Peter Mahler
Both sides offered the testimony of expert appraisers as to the rental value of the LLC’s property. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:17 am by Peter Mahler
Both sides offered the testimony of expert appraisers as to the rental value of the LLC’s property. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:42 am by Quinta Jurecic
” Attorney General Jeff Sessions has promised to appeal the case, International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 7:33 am by Joy Waltemath
The case had to be remanded to give the nurses the opportunity to show that their defamation claim, even though based in part on protected petitioning activity, when viewed as a whole was nonetheless not a “SLAPP” suit (Blanchard v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
My primary interest has always been to advance liberty and to limit government power, and I saw the law as the most effective method to do so. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:56 pm by kerry.sheehan
But while historically, overzealous rights holders may have been stymied to some extent by the law’s limitation of their rights, the authors note that recent technological changes have made their quest a lot easier. [read post]
24 May 2017, 6:55 am by Joy Waltemath
The Fifth Circuit found ample, albeit conflicting, evidence to support a jury finding that a COO who made the decision to fire a recruiter after he reported the CEO’s sexual harassment either knew of the recruiter’s complaints to HR or was a decisionmaker alongside the VP of HR, who absolutely knew of the complaints, discussed the firing with the COO beforehand, participated in the termination meeting, and entered the recruiter’s termination into the company’s computer… [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:43 pm by Hans von Spakovsky
Ten years ago, litigants on the left side of the political aisle as well as the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:06 am by Jani Ihalainen
(Source: Good Little Robot)The legislative position is not any different, according to the Court, from the common law position as set out in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons (discussed more here), which restricted the rights in items that have been sold (albeit in relation to copyright and not patent rights). [read post]
22 May 2017, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
The new space will allow each side to have 16 attorneys in the court room at a time, and it can accommodate a total of 132 people. [read post]
22 May 2017, 4:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”   Of course, the different sides disagree with whether or not this is a good or a bad thing. [read post]