Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 8801 - 8820
of 9,094
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2007, 6:14 am
See also Flood v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 4:21 am
The district court also found value in holding the trial in the state where the borrowers reside and where the court is familiar with the controlling law. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 6:30 am
District Judge Allen Sharp ruled in favor of Indiana Right to Life, saying the state's code of conduct for judges was unconstitutional because it broadly forbade judicial candidates from stating their views on legal issues. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 7:29 pm
"Therefore, the court reversed and remanded the district court's "grant of summary judgment" in the case.McKeague partially concurred, agreeing that the statute went beyond the boundaries of the First Amendment's protections of free speech with its aims to reduce child pornography. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 12:21 am
"Therefore, the court reversed and remanded the district court's "grant of summary judgment" in the case.McKeague partially concurred, agreeing that the statute went beyond the boundaries of the First Amendment's protections of free speech with its aims to reduce child pornography. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 10:11 am
Sure the District Court's explanation is incoherent, but the First says it wasn't an abuse of discretion. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:37 am
Tsekhanovich, No. 05-4809"Conviction and sentence for false statements, mail fraud, and health care fraud-related charges is affirmed where the district court did not exceed its allowable discretion by admitting challenged testimony, as the government demonstrated that the lay opinion testimony was sufficiently based on and rationally derived from the witness's first-hand perceptions. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
It was introduced into US state law nearly 30 years ago and the first execution by this method was in 1982. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:13 pm
Through a Glass DarklyBy JOE DeRAYMONDThe Supreme Court has decided to rule on the humanity of using lethal injection in executions, in Baze v Rees, a Kentucky case in which two inmates scheduled to be killed by the State have questioned the method of their punishment. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:41 am
The district court agreed that one of the canons was unconstitutional and the state defendants appeal. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 5:30 pm
Cohen v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 5:59 am
In a decision Tuesday, the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court's decision that a state had not waived its Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 9:20 am
We find that the district court correctly determined that DHS is not judicially estopped from asserting sovereign immunity in the present lawsuit, and did not abuse its discretion by dismissing this action in the face of BPMC's argument to the contrary.. . .Finally, BPMC argues that a recent Supreme Court decision, Central Virginia Community Coll. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 1:28 pm
., lead counsel for the plaintiffs in a Pennsylvania suit, stating that: "Federal District Court Judge Marvin Katz has granted a preliminary injunction against provisions of the Pennsylvania Code of Judicial Conduct that prohibited state court judicial candidates from responding to a questionnaire asking their views on legal and political issues. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 11:40 am
Further, a number of district court opinions suggest that sentencing courts may be taking a variety of post-Booker approaches to the consideration of acquitted conduct sentencing enhancements. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 4:37 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 5:32 pm
A very divided Florida Supreme Court has affirmed a ruling by the state's 2nd District Court of Appeal, holding that the "impact rule" that normally applies to negligence lawsuits seeking solely damages for emotional distress, should not apply to a suit arising from a violation of the state's HIV confidentiality law. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 6:19 am
See Wolford v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 4:55 am
Rhodes v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 11:24 am
But in a new opinion released Oct. 11 in United States v. [read post]
