Search for: "State v. Word" Results 8801 - 8820 of 40,667
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
In Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd & Anor [2019] UKSC 27 (see our blog here) it held that the meaning of section 1(1) is such that the question of whether serious harm has been suffered must be determined by reference to actual facts – the impact of the statement – not just the meaning of the words. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:45 am by Jonathan Shaub
” In other words, executive privilege exists, in part, to protect against the concrete harm that the disclosure of specific information at a particular time may cause. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 3:58 am by Peter Mahler
The Point 128 LLC v Choi, decided earlier this month by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Andrea Masley, did not involve a formal withdrawal notice and demand for payment of fair value as in Jacobs. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 7:16 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
 22. [60] As noted above, the privative clause in the WSIA, s.118, is strongly worded. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A state park police officer [Claimant] filed an application for performance of duty disability retirement benefits with the New York State and Local Police and Fire Retirement System [System] alleging that he was permanently incapacitated from the performance of his duties as a result of a slip and fall on his employer's premises. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 4:22 am by SHG
As the Supreme Court held in Branzburg v. [read post]