Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 8801 - 8820
of 16,401
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am
A strong panel of the Third Circuit affirmed the apportionment instruction to the jury and the jury finding. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:30 pm
The key law relied upon in the case, the Alien Tort Statute, requires, after a 2013 Supreme Court decision called Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum, that plaintiffs show that the matter “touch and concern” the United States in order for the case to proceed here. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 1:19 pm
But the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in Alexander v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:36 am
In Wallace v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 2:15 am
State v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 9:22 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:37 am
Although I try to include on this blog topics involving issues from outside the United States, because of my background and experience, U.S-related topics tend to predominate. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:15 am
Supreme Court's 2000 decision in Troxel v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 12:58 am
We also talked to women’s legal services and those sort of domestic violence services and they were very strong on the problem of revenge porn. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 9:24 am
One of the most important and strong areas of growth is the monoclonal antibody field. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
We foresee no obstacle to a State’s dealing effectively with this problem. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 4:33 am
(a)) and the court sentenced him to 25 years to life in state prison”, he appealed. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 12:48 pm
The facts in Heineman v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 3:30 am
There is no limit on the quantum of evidence that the government may amass—within the rules—to make its case as strong as possible. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
The PDA was necessitated by a Supreme Court decision two years earlier, General Electric v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 6:16 am
But Hamet v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:18 am
But there is a strong case for green retrofitting. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 12:37 pm
It does not, however, constitute a defense in a proceeding under the Uniform Support of Dependents Law, a basic assumption of which is that a father is responsible for the support of his dependent children, regardless of the acts of the mother as ruled in Aberlin v Aberlin and Goodman v Goodman. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 7:55 am
The court also found that the employer failed to engage in the interactive process in good faith (Franzi v UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside, September 4, 2014, Fischer, N). [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 7:02 am
The Court explained there is a strong presumption that constitutional errors are harmless, see Neder v. [read post]
