Search for: "U.S. Direct Express" Results 8801 - 8820 of 9,645
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2009, 9:13 am by JudicialWatchWeb
Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, today released its 2009 list of Washington's "Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 11:11 pm by Randy Barnett
I am posting these without any editorial comment, express or implied, so readers can be aware of official policy, rather than rumors. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 8:42 pm
He stresses too the "sheer time, effort, and expense involved" in periodically transporting an entire trial apparatus to and from U.S. military base on the island of Cuba. [read post]
The chapter concludes with an expression of measured optimism, commenting on the appearance of “green shoots” with “unclear implications. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:26 pm by WSJ Staff
’s long-time vice president of finance has resulted in a criminal complaint being filed against her by the U.S. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:57 pm
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17 (1966); Kinetic Concepts, 554 F.3d at 1019. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:06 am by ALeonard
"  Thus, it was not a case of direct discrimination, but rather "indirect discrimination" in the sense that requiring her to perform her duties would burden her religious belief as it was expressed through her refusal to perform an assigned job duty. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:13 am by Ashwin Sharma
Individuals who are 14 years of age and older who are U.S. citizens, U.S. nationals, U.S. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 5:34 am
It was obvious that then-U.S. attorney William F. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 2:03 am
Interactive Gift Express, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 9:25 am by Lawrence Solum
A limited, well-defined interpretation will still allow for the intended purpose of prevention and punishment of genocide, yet respect the basic tenets of free expression. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 6:45 am by Matt Osenga
Intellectual Science sued Sony and other defendants for infringement of U.S. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 5:32 am
In his jury instructions, Lodge explained to twelve stalwart Idahoans that the First Amendment protects advocacy, even advocacy to break the law, “unless the speech is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 9:28 pm
I hate to sound like a broken record, but I have to go back once again to Healy: A government actor cannot compel indirectly a result that it is constitutionally prohibited from achieving directly. 408 U.S. at 183. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 8:25 am
The only U.S. corporation to come on the side of the treaty was Google, who has expressed concerns that this is another case of the copyright industries blindly opposing any loosening of copyright law, no matter how much public benefit may be derived. [read post]