Search for: "Bui v. State"
Results 8821 - 8840
of 9,831
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2009, 1:19 pm
(f) State Actions for Violations- (1) AUTHORITY OF STATES- In addition to such other remedies as are provided under State law, if the chief law enforcement officer of a State, or an official or agency designated by a State, has reason to believe that any person has violated or is violating section 9, the State-- (A) may bring an action to enjoin such violation in any appropriate United States district court or in any other court of… [read post]
19 May 2009, 5:00 am
" Id. at *49.Along the way, the court applied Twombley in the context of this drug promotion case and cited Bridge v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 7:24 pm
Adopting the Illinois Supreme Court's reasoning in 2314 Lincoln Park West Condominium Association v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:29 am
That is why it will probably be more productive to see what happens to the American Airlines v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:00 am
In Leibert v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 2:57 pm
Algard running errands, he stated that four described coins had gone missing. [read post]
16 May 2009, 7:33 am
Buy American Requirements for Construction Last, but not least, the rules implement the Buy American requirements for federal buildings and public works funded by the stimulus plan. [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:56 pm
Kasic stated, "I like to work hard to make more money for my family. [read post]
15 May 2009, 4:36 pm
Earlier this year the Texas Supreme Court decided Entergy v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 1:53 pm
" (Waller v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:10 am
(Marquez v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 8:53 am
Champion Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 6:54 am
Supreme Court Justice Byron White, in Taylor v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 10:05 pm
By Eric Goldman FPX, LLC v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:07 pm
The Court cited to precedence in Gall v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 4:54 am
U.S. v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 2:33 am
United States v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 11:16 am
See Khan v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
8 May 2009, 9:00 am
Google changes trade mark policy: lets advertisers buy rivals’ trade marks as keywords in 194 countries (Out-Law) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Google and the value of brand advertising (IP finance) Nokia and iPhone; strong, famous and hip? [read post]
