Search for: "Does 1 - 29"
Results 8821 - 8840
of 13,860
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2019, 9:03 pm
Significant violations discussed in the amended letter included: The firm does not have a HACCP plan for refrigerated salted herring products to control the food safety hazard of scombrotoxin (histamine) formation. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 8:57 am
Closes January 29, 2018. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:22 am
Then, I argue that the geographical nexus requirement, in fact, is extremely difficult to defend in terms of the lex lata, legal policy, literature or practice.[1] This piece does not, however, discuss in detail the obligations in fact owed to Protected Persons in situations or territories once the geographic nexus requirement is rejected. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 12:00 pm
It does not provide any exemption from the derivatives qualification and approval requirements governing the creation and marketing of derivatives in Quebec, and it does not specifically exempt non-Quebec market participants from other ongoing compliance requirements applicable to “dealers” and “advisers” under the QDA as does the OTC Derivatives Exemption. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 4:42 am
In the 1–2 game, the small blind was $1, and the big blind was $2. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 2:33 am
This principle, restated in R v Giannetto [1997] 1 Cr App R 1, has attracted strong criticism on the grounds that the dissimilarity between principal and accessory is one of strikingly different factual positions, thereby breach [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 4:16 pm
"It does not. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
Dairy Farmers of America, No. 29 WAP 2022 (Pa. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Those cases were Matter of Adoption of Baby Boy D[28] and Matter of Adoption of D.M.J.[29] In Baby Boy D, the father was a member of the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma and the mother was a non-Indian.[30] The mother consented to adoption of Baby Boy D and the child was adopted without notice to the father and without his consent.[31] After learning that the child had been adopted, the father filed a petition seeking to vacate the adoption on grounds that the child was… [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 9:38 am
On June 1, Zhao Lijian, a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson said, “Any words and deeds from the United States that harm the interests of China will be resolutely counterattacked by the Chinese side. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 3:44 pm
Does she really think that Catholic communion should have been banned during Prohibition? [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
HOW DOES A DEFENDANT ESTABLISH REMOVAL IS WARRANTED? [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 10:30 pm
Q: Does the Navy work with the Coast Guard? [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:53 am
The provision also does not classify “in effect. [read post]
11 May 2011, 5:28 pm
Asahi Glass notes in dicta that direct purchasers who face suit have standing to pursue Walker Process claims, but a supplier who is not the target of a suit by a patent holder, does not have standing to bring a Walker Process claim. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm
Whilst such a conclusion might not always be borne out by in-depth empirical research vis-à-vis a given sign, the Office should provide an ‘informed estimation’ which: must be grounded in a specific social context, and it cannot ignore factual evidence that either confirms or possibly casts doubt on EUIPO’s own views on what does or does not conform to accepted principles of morality within a given society at a given time. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am
(relisted after the March 22, March 29, April 12, April 18, April 26, May 9, May 16, May 23, May 30, June 6 and June 13 conferences) Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
The EPO sent a notification pursuant to R 69(1) EPC 1973 dated March 16, 2006. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Wade: Judge Friendly's Draft Abortion Opinion, 29 Harv. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:44 pm
Section 68.2(1) of the Act which addresses the effect of fixing tariffs certified by the Board in various other contexts and which gives collectives the right to collect royalties under an approved tariff was not considered by the Court. [read post]
