Search for: "Mark" Results 8821 - 8840 of 151,849
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2009, 12:00 am
"Honda feebly argued that, unlike in Audi, its mark is a standard character mark, but the Board shrugged that off: "[r]egardless of the type of drawing in the application, the specimens must indicate use of the applied-for matter as a mark - i.e. as a single mark. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 7:00 am
In the instant case, Applicant claimed to be using the mark for four services, when in fact it had used the mark only for one. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 2:55 am by John L. Welch
[The PTO did not refuse registration on the ground that the applied-for mark is a "phantom" mark.]Applicant Lorillard claimed registrability under Section 2(f). [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 10:43 am
Four weeks later he was dead.Click to read the journal.Click to read Mark Evison's obituary. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 3:13 pm
This morning the IPKat asked on behalf of a friend for helpful comments about buying ownerless trade marks as bona vacantia. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:00 am by Evelyn Douek
During Mark Zuckerberg’s 10-plus hours of testimony before Congress on April 10 and 11, the Facebook CEO was asked at least six times about his company’s alleged censorship of conservative internet personalities Diamond and Silk—to the point where New York Times technology reporter Kevin Roose commented, “I think if you were an alien who dropped down to earth to observe the testimony … you would think there was no one on earth who was more important than… [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 2:46 pm
” If Marks stays at eBay for less than a year, he’ll have to repay the full bonus. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 4:17 am by Robert Margolis
The court reversed summary judgment dismissing a claim by Beach Mart, Inc. that the federal registrations owned by L&L Wings, Inc. for that mark, which Beach Mart had licensed from L&L, should be cancelled because L&L, in fact, itself was a licensee of the mark from a third-party. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 11:02 am by Richard Gould-Saltman
My learned colleague Mark Chinn** from Jackson, MS, posted a deliberately provocative title to his blog this week: said Mark: "If you get a prenuptial agreement in the days before the marriage, don’t sign it! [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 5:01 am
Four of the site's Top 100 usages incorporate the word mark Google, for instance, plus the parodistic crackberry (cf. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:53 am by admin
  Registration is awaiting proof from Facebook that it actually has used the mark in commerce. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 10:34 am by Sabrina I. Pacifici
USPTO, May 7, 2019 – The assigned trademark examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and has determined the following: “…Registration is refused because the applied-for mark is a slogan or term that does not function as a trademark or service mark to indicate the source of applicant’s goods and/or services and to identify and distinguish them from others. [read post]
12 May 2010, 6:00 am by Barry Eagar
The trade mark has been used in Australia since at least 1947. [read post]
6 May 2011, 8:11 am
The Court held the Foundation's marks valid and did indeed order the defendant not only to stop infringing the Foundation's marks but not to file further marks as requested by the Foundation. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 2:51 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
"Blaze marks" again The written description requirement of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 8:27 am by MBettman
It’s the blog’s policy to note when cases it previews pass the one year mark under submission. [read post]