Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF S M" Results 8821 - 8840 of 33,820
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2014, 7:20 am
***Shawn Peters’ excellent “Judging Jehovah’s Witnessess” tells this story in great detail, if you’re interested. [read post]
15 May 2012, 3:00 am by Terry Hart
History is fascinating, but I’m not a historian. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 6:25 pm by Michael O'Hear
With the Court’s end-of-term flurry now complete, I find myself with a substantial backlog of interesting cases to blog about. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 4:28 am
" There's a "blue wave" this year, you see.You have to scroll down to the bottom third of the article to find out anything about the potential Democratic Party candidate, which is all I'm interested in, because Walker isn't going to lose unless he's challenged by someone who can beat him:Although eight candidates remain in the race, many Democratic operatives and activists believe that only three have credible paths to victory. [read post]
8 May 2014, 7:20 am by Dan Filler
 Thus we have been treated to the WMU Thomas M. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:22 am by Charles Sartain
First, have you wondered why all the news your Google search finds seems to spell climate D-O-O-M? [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 2:51 am
We were detained for about 50 minutes on the side of the road.The interesting thing about this case? [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 12:53 pm by Kevin
I mentioned and recommended his previous book, Holy Hullabaloos, a very funny and interesting piece of work on the legal battles over the relationship between church and state in America, and am glad to do the same now for The Odd Clauses. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 2:25 pm
Texas, etc.). 6) The tone of Justice Scalia’s dissent is interesting in light of his opinion in Whren v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 12:15 pm by Elizabeth Litten
“I don’t need to worry about HIPAA if I’m only disclosing a patient’s/member’s telephone number, since that’s not PHI. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 9:14 am by Guest Blogger
As it turns out, none of the states interests in not permitting plural marriages are either compelling or important. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 5:00 pm by Richard Goldfarb
  I suspect you’ve all been humming what I’m going to suggest here. [read post]