Search for: "State v. Little" Results 8821 - 8840 of 23,584
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2008, 6:09 am by Marc Mayerson
Regardless whether a particular jurisdiction is a "notice/prejudice" state, see Prince Georges Cty. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 6:09 am by Marc Mayerson
Regardless whether a particular jurisdiction is a "notice/prejudice" state, see Prince Georges Cty. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:52 pm by Richard D. Friedman
On Tuesday, I attended argument of Williams v. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 9:03 pm by Joshua Sellers
And commentators suggesting that the opinion does little more than afford states the latitude to benignly experiment with their voting rules reveal willful naivety about the Republican Party’s aims. [read post]
He stated that “[if the Congress was] trying to build a little court proceeding [within PTAB,] . . . [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 3:11 am by SHG
” Salmon Spawning & Recovery All. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 12:53 pm by Stephen Griffin
Vann Woodward, this left little for public education, public health, and aid-dependent people such as the insane and the blind. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
And the United States Supreme Court, the Michigan Supreme Court, this Court, and courts of other states have treated the right as extending beyond firearms. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 4:50 pm by Amy Howe
Virtually all legal experts had given the lawsuit little chance of succeeding from the moment it was filed on Monday. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
"An employee's probationary appointment may be terminated without a hearing for any reason or no reason at all, so long as the termination was not in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Messenger v State of New York Dept. of Corr. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
"An employee's probationary appointment may be terminated without a hearing for any reason or no reason at all, so long as the termination was not in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Messenger v State of New York Dept. of Corr. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am by Amy Howe
  Rory Little covered the decision for this blog, with other coverage coming from Tony Mauro (who also covers yesterday’s decision in Kingsley v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
Indeed, abolitionists have good reason to fear such a reaction given what happened several decades ago in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Furman v. [read post]