Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 8821 - 8840 of 16,401
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2014, 11:06 pm by Jeff Gamso
The execution of a person who can show that he is innocent comes perilously close to simple murder.Herrera v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 2:20 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  If it is pure and potent, it simply does not matter when or where it came from.Here is a description of the crime from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in Trottie v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 8:59 pm by Florian Mueller
About 24 hours after denying (except for a minor part) Apple's motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) following the spring 2014 Apple v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
  While U.S. law appears to have embraced many of the substantive premises of law that contributed to the law of the Institutes, U.S. law makers—courts, legislatures and voters—retained a strong and strongly conservative adherence to its mixed system of judge administered law punctuated by bursts of statutes. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 7:43 am by Venkat Balasubramani
PRO TIP: I presume the temptation is strong to monitor your soon-to-be-ex-spouse’s email, but resist it at all costs! [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 11:54 pm by Florian Mueller
For example, one of Apple's patent claims-in-suit has meanwhile been rejected by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and another patent-in-suit is from the same patent family whose European member has unanimously been deemed invalid by ten judges. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 9:24 pm by Chuck Cosson
This suggests some core criteria that should be present whenever any regulation of tool providers is considered:  1) strong social consensus that there are concrete and significant harms to be addressed; 2) strong consensus that obligations should apply equally across all providers; 3) strong consensus the regulation is appropriately tailored and enforceable as a technical and practical matter. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
  First of all, the Third Circuit made clear in its en banc decision in Dunn v. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 8:00 pm by David McDonald
To this, the court stated, “… it would be troubling to excuse a party who behaves correctly only when caught. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 7:27 am by Jane Chong
Here’s the introduction: In June 2014, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Riley v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 8:33 am
However, if nothing else, it strengthens the impression (which has now become particularly strong) that Member States retain fairly limited autonomy in areas affected by EU copyright directives. [read post]