Search for: "Bui v. State"
Results 8841 - 8860
of 9,831
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2009, 4:39 am
Allen v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:19 pm
In Kinik v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:07 pm
Since section 112 only addresses the termination of service contracts, this amendment really isn't absolutely necessary, and this is especially so in light of Justice Paul Perel's decision in the case of PSCC No. 668 v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 1:02 pm
The breakthrough last year came with Witt v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 8:18 am
” (Roland v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 8:34 am
Indeed, the new AAG for Antitrust has stated her pessimism regarding the existence of type I errors in antitrust. [read post]
4 May 2009, 10:28 am
., writes: The judicial deconstruction of police encounters with defendants has produced a notable decision in the case of United States v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 5:00 am
The second case is Stack v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:22 pm
Doing that allows users to switch phone carriers without buying a new phone. [read post]
1 May 2009, 10:00 am
(IP finance) Why pirates buy more music and music labels fail (TorrentFreak) RIAA’s hostile takeover of the internet (TorrentFreak) Google custom search cuts uTorrent off (TorrentFreak) Global - Trade Marks US National Telecommunications and Information Administration seeks comments on letting go of internet control (Intellectual Property Watch) Australia Hot TV Guides, anyone? [read post]
1 May 2009, 6:17 am
The tax break is part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.Here are seven things you should know about this new deduction: (i) State and local sales taxes paid on up to $49,500 of the purchase price of qualifying vehicles are deductible; (ii) Qualified motor vehicles generally include new (not used) cars, light trucks, motor homes and motorcycles; (iii) Purchases must occur after Feb. 16, 2009, and before Jan. 1, 2010; (iv) This deduction can be taken regardless of whether… [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:45 am
Back in 2006, in State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 10:43 am
Mr Williams gave evidence and stated that the property was not to be held on trust for the Lemas children but that someone had added this clause to the trust documentation after the establishment of the trust. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 10:12 am
The case is Gregory v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 4:40 am
U.S. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 4:32 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
(Yeah, yeah: We were thinking about sex, drugs, and Lexecon waivers.)You know the story: Lexecon v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
(IPEG) Denmark Revamp of Danish PTO English language site – invitation for help from users (Class 46) Europe ECJ gives Copad ruling on exhaustion and luxury goods; interpretation of Article 8(2) leads to new questions: Copad SA v Christian Dior couture SA, Vincent Gladel, as liquidator of Société industrielle lingerie (Class 46) (IPKat) Anti-patent rally; criticism of practice of patenting biological processes - Munich (Intellectual… [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 9:00 am
– Andrew Logie on need for fresh business strategy for rights-owning sector (IP finance) Why everybody lost The Pirate Bay trial (TorrentFreak) Swedish anti-piracy office threatens BitTorrent trackers (TorrentFreak) Big Content seeks injunction as Pirate Bay appeals verdict (Ars Technica) Hundreds protest against Pirate Bay decision (Michael Geist) (TorrentFreak) Pirate Party membership surges following Pirate Bay verdict (TorrentFreak) IFPI site under attack by Pirate Bay supporters… [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:59 am
The Court had reversed the case twice before, but finally allowed the verdict to stand on state law grounds. [read post]
