Search for: "Chief Justice of the United States"
Results 8841 - 8860
of 14,933
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2014, 5:08 am
” — Chief Justice Roberts, writing for the Court in Riley v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:52 pm
As Bill noted Wednesday, the United States Supreme Court in Riley v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 11:36 am
Let’s take a look at Breyer’s majority opinion (which was joined in by Chief Justice Roberts and Associate Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan), and then the dissent by Scalia (writing for himself and Justices Thomas and Alito). [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
In a letter to Congress, which Wells posted here, the President stated that U.S. action in Iraq is being conducted “pursuant to my constitutional authority to conduct U.S. foreign relations and as Commander in Chief and Chief Executive. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:54 am
California and United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:39 am
Chief Justice Garman pointed out that there is a provision in the Bond Act stating that remedies under the Act are cumulative – what impact did that have? [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:14 am
California and United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 6:30 am
Paul address, Pound identified appellate courts’ excessive granting of new trials as one of “the causes of popular dissatisfaction with the administrative justice” in the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:07 pm
Citing Justice Sotomayor’s concurrence in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:42 pm
United Artists Television, Inc. and Teleprompter Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:42 pm
United Artists Television, Inc. and Teleprompter Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:42 pm
United Artists Television, Inc. and Teleprompter Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:00 pm
This is information that can be found on a device in nearly every pocket in the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:55 am
It's good that the United States Supreme Court has now settled the issue of personal privacy rights in favor of citizens as a decision for law enforcement would have reduced the privacy of every American. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:44 am
” Notably, this view was taken by Justice Department’s OLC chief Randy Moss—and as the Washington Post described in October 2001, it won out over proposals simply amend the executive order itself: Since the late Clinton administration, executive branch lawyers have held that the president’s inherent authority to use lethal force—under Article 2, Section 2 of the Constitution—permits an order to kill an individual enemy of the… [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:07 am
United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:02 am
California and United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:40 am
Caifornia and United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 9:50 pm
First, here’s Greenhouse: The justices ruled two years ago in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:35 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
