Search for: "Mark Cover" Results 8841 - 8860 of 18,230
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm by Andrew Hamm
Lyle Denniston covered the decision for this blog, and Amy Howe explained the outcome in Plain English. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm by Simon Fodden
Off to the right there was a wooden telephone pole sporting a worn, blue-painted metal box with the image of an old telephone handset stamped into the cover. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 7:06 am by Gene Quinn
On Thursday, June 11, 2015, the House Judiciary Committee held a hearing for the purpose of marking up “the Innovation Act. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 4:50 pm by Kali Borkoski
Lyle reported on the decision for this blog, and Amy Howe covered the decision for us in Plain English. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:36 pm by Andrew Hamm
Lyle Denniston covered the decision for this blog, Amy Howe explained the outcome in Plain English, and Mark Walsh provided a view from the Courtroom. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:10 pm
Here's a curious tale of a trade mark that might have been. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:28 am by Kali Borkoski
Burwell decision here, and Amy covered the decision “In Plain English. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:34 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
(Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images) Here’s a look at how the cases got started. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:25 pm by Andy
This led to News America being sued over issues of trade mark and false endorsement, to which the Ninth Circuit, in an opinion written by Judge Kozinski, developed the doctrine of 'nominative fair use'. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 11:56 am by Kevin
He's been sketching the courts since 1976, mostly covering the Supreme Court for NBC News. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 10:52 pm by Kevin O'Keefe
He only wanted to present at conferences where he was not constrained in what he could cover. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am by Amy Howe
  Writing for this blog, Mark Walsh provided a “view” of the day’s events from the Courtroom. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:22 am by Steve Baird
” Roku’s response was brief and to the point, but one might debate whether it covered all the requested points, information, and documentation: “The Examining Attorney requested additional information and responses to inquiries regarding Applicant’s mark. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:35 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Referring to the above quotation taken from the prevailing opinion in the case last cited (citation omitted), that 'Neither industry nor business has been invading the residential development in the involved area', it must be kept in mind that in the case at bar business has invaded the area in question to a marked degree, thus affording grounds for a reasonable probability that the prohibition or restriction would be modified or removed in the near future. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 2:31 pm by Michael
For example, a work could infringe copyright, moral rights, database rights, trade mark rights, design rights, rights in passing off, or any other intellectual property rights. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm by Richard M. Re
I’ve covered the case before and so will only briefly summarize the background. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
” It wouldn’t take much research to figure out that this claim is way off the mark. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 4:16 am
" DRI began marking its product as "bonded leather," a term some others in the industry found misleading. [read post]