Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 8841 - 8860
of 9,094
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2007, 5:41 pm
Other courts permit an attorney to appeal from a judicial order in which the court states that the attorney has engaged in professional misconduct, holding that such a declaration is itself an appealable sanction. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 11:46 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan declared Sept. 4 (Fieger v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:50 pm
As the Court stated in Buenoano v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 1:31 am
District Court for Western Louisiana. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 5:42 pm
And if that weren't enough of a reach, instead of filing it in San Francisco, Alameda or Los Angeles state courts, where there are some judges who might go for this sort of thing, Lockyer filed the case, and Jerry prosecuted it, in the Federal Northern District. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 1:48 pm
In light of this, the court stated that “[t]he question before us now is whether 42 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 10:11 am
State - The Nevada Supreme Court reverses a judgment of conviction for first-degree murder based upon the district court's failure to instruct the jury that a robbery committed as an afterthought to a murder cannot support a felony-murder conviction. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 4:05 am
The Government argues that the retroactive application of Johnson does not violate the Due Process Clause because the Supreme Court's judicial interpretation of the statute was neither unexpected nor indefensible.In a recent unpublished decision, United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 8:31 pm
") Rather poignantly, in 1966 the Ohio court still flew the flag of judicial self-respect. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 4:11 am
"
U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, September 10, 2007US v. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 9:42 am
Arminak v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 1:27 pm
Seattle School District, 127 S.Ct. 2738 (2007). [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 5:36 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 12:36 pm
Shortly after this Court's decision, a court in the District of Connecticut enjoined the Government from enforcing the nondisclosure requirement of § 2709(c) insofar as it prevented the plaintiff in that case from revealing its identity as a recipient of an NSL, holding that § 2709(c) failed to satisfy strict scrutiny because it was not narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 12:55 am
The court is arguing that Congress cannot get around First Amendment requirements of judicial review by redefining what forms of judicial review are permissible. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 2:12 pm
http://www.nlrb.gov/shared_files/Board%20Decisions/350/v35075.htm Upon remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, the Board affirmed its previous holding, reported at 335 NLRB 1217 (2001), that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(1) of the Act by maintaining and prosecuting a preempted state court lawsuit against competitor L. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 5:11 am
Q: Courts have imposed a materiality requirement in Lanham Act false advertising cases, and some have even required specific evidence that a false statement is material - e.g., Pizza Hut Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:44 pm
· Chuck Rosenberg, Unites States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia · Rodney A. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 8:32 am
The Court has now docketed District of Columbia v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:14 am
In United States v. [read post]
