Search for: "DEFENDER SECURITY COMPANY" Results 8861 - 8880 of 17,855
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm by Brian E. Barreira
  Nowhere in federal Medicaid trust law or federal Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) law, which also must be followed by the Office of Medicaid, is the countability of an irrevocable trust evaluated based upon the details of its investment portfolio. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 12:45 pm
But local governments across the country are using threats of jail and actual imprisonment to secure payments toward court fines and fees. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 9:05 am
Unsealed Iranian Indictment Is A Powerful Message, Or So They SayOn March 24, 2016, the United States Department of Justice announced the unsealing of an Indictment in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York naming seven individual defendants who allegedly served as hackers in the employ of ITSec Team and Mersad Company, which were computer security companies working on behalf of the Iranian government (including the Islamic… [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 9:03 am
 On March 24, 2016, the United States Department of Justice ("DOJ") announced the unsealing of an Indictment in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ("SDNY") naming seven individual defendants who allegedly served as hackers in the employ of ITSec Team and Mersad Company, which were computer security companies working on behalf of the Iranian government (including the Islamic Revolutionary Guard … [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 9:00 am by Suzette Pringle
On March 4, 2016, the Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of two related securities actions against Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, its predecessor Genzyme Corporation, and three company executives (collectively, “Sanofi”). [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 6:44 am by Alexis Yee-Garcia
(“Harman” or “the Company”) and related individual defendants, argued that the D.C. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In their amended complaint, the plaintiffs alleged that the defendants misrepresented the value of its collateralized debt obligations; the extent to which its assets were held as subprime-related mortgage backed securities; and the extent to which its ill-fated decision to acquire ABN-AMRO had compromised the company’s solvency. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:29 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Karasik In an important EEOC case involving the intersection of company dress code policies and the rights of employees seeking religious accommodations, following a grant of both parties’ summary judgment motions in part, which we previously blogged about here, the EEOC moved for reconsideration of the dismissal of one individual’s claims against the defendant, JetStream Ground Services, Inc. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 6:38 am by Bob Kraft
If another party such as a development company impedes on your rights to control that land, you should certainly sue. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Peter Mahler
Background The case pits plaintiff Luigi Verghetta against defendants-brothers Jeffrey and James Innocenti. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Peter Mahler
Background The case pits plaintiff Luigi Verghetta against defendants-brothers Jeffrey and James Innocenti. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Peter Mahler
Background The case pits plaintiff Luigi Verghetta against defendants-brothers Jeffrey and James Innocenti. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 8:35 am by D. Daxton White
  The SEC seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement with prejudgment interest, and monetary penalties from all defendants as well as bars prohibiting Jesenik, Oliver, and Gillis from serving as officers or directors of any public company. [read post]
Chinese investors that have secured all necessary approvals to invest in American companies are not being allowed to actually make that investment. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:06 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
To meet these requirements, the HIPAA Security Rule requires that Covered Entities conduct and be prepared to product documentation of their audit and other efforts to comply with the Security Rule Most Covered Entities will want to consider including an assessment of the adequacy of their existing practices under the Crosswalk and other requirements disclosed by OCR in these assessments to help position the Covered Entity to defend or mitigate HIPAA CMP and other… [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:06 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
To meet these requirements, the HIPAA Security Rule requires that Covered Entities conduct and be prepared to product documentation of their audit and other efforts to comply with the Security Rule Most Covered Entities will want to consider including an assessment of the adequacy of their existing practices under the Crosswalk and other requirements disclosed by OCR in these assessments to help position the Covered Entity to defend or mitigate HIPAA CMP and other… [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 3:43 pm by John Floyd
  The district court denied the motion but allowed Lara to preserve the search issue for an appeal after which the defendant pled guilty. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 12:18 pm by Maira Sutton
However, the Malaysian government could defend itself against such a claim by arguing that its censorship was “to achieve a legitimate public policy objective,” such as national security or the defense of public morals. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 10:16 am by John Fullerton III
Section 806 of SOX prohibits publicly traded companies, as well as their subsidiaries, contractors, subcontractors, and agents, from taking adverse personnel actions against employees for reporting activity that they reasonably believe constitutes mail fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud, securities fraud, or a violation of any Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rule or federal law relating to fraud against shareholders. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 10:16 am by John F. Fullerton III and Jason Kaufman
Section 806 of SOX prohibits publicly traded companies, as well as their subsidiaries, contractors, subcontractors, and agents, from taking adverse personnel actions against employees for reporting activity that they reasonably believe constitutes mail fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud, securities fraud, or a violation of any Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rule or federal law relating to fraud against shareholders. [read post]