Search for: "Ex Parte May" Results 8861 - 8880 of 12,870
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am by SteinMcewen, LLP
§ 273(e), only persons who have been using the invention commercially may take advantage of the defense. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:22 am by Nick Armstrong, Matrix
Those needs may cut right to the heart of human dignity. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 9:44 am by C. Sean Stephens
I frequently refer people to counselors as part of our helping approach to divorce and because I believe that if successful,  it has enormous benefits for a client. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 9:00 am by Gretchen Harders
  PPACA authorizes the Secretary to issue ex parte cease and desist orders when it appears that the conduct of a MEWA is:  (a) fraudulent; (b) creates an immediate danger to the public safety or welfare; or (c) is causing or is expected to cause significant, imminent and irreparable public injury. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 10:05 pm by Adam Zimmerman
  We prepare, as a class, to interview the CEO of a corporation sued by former employee’s ex-spouse. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 12:05 pm by Xandra Kramer
In this proposal the Denilauler restriction is removed for ex parte decisions. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:08 am by Legal Beagle
Since 2007 the First Minister and all other Scottish Government Ministers have chosen to have no role in any part of the Honours process. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Therefore, if the USPTO were to impose excessively high fees to request ex parte reexamination, IPR, PGR and TBMP, such will be inconsistent with sound public policy. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 9:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
Specifically, the new materials being tested are: (1) the rules governing prioritized examination, (2) the rules governing the revised standard for granting inter partes reexamination; and (3) the new rules governing ex parte patent appeals. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 9:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
Specifically, the new materials being tested are: (1) the rules governing prioritized examination, (2) the rules governing the revised standard for granting inter partes reexamination; and (3) the new rules governing ex parte patent appeals. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 7:58 pm by Dan
  The Chinese government is making it easier for foreigners to learn Mandarin, as part of a highly organized campaign to strengthen their “soft power” abroad. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 5:58 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
"Another Ham Sandwich" recalled episode 17, second season, entitled "Ham Sandwich" (original air date March 22, 2011) in which Lockhart & Gardner's David Lee and Alicia Florrick represented drug kingpin Lemond Bishop in his divorce and custody settlements; Blake confronted Kalinda about her one-night affair with Peter Florrick; Kalinda was subpoenaed to appear before a grand jury related to a variety of her past crimes with Alicia advising Kalinda to not answer… [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 7:39 am by admin
It sounds like your ex-directors are in breach of their fiduciary duties. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 7:07 am
In May 2011 the mark was declared invalid. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 7:05 am by Rosengren Kohlmeyer, Law Office
You may also feel more in control of the proceedings, since you and your ex are able to choose the arbitrator. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 6:00 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
Something can be gleaned from each of his opinions which may be relevant to a non-compete attorney. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 11:59 am by Susan Brenner
Northwest Airlines’ Motion to Compel is part of the process of discovery in a civil case. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 9:45 am by Eric
To be fair, some of these lawsuits aren't going very far, and expansive secondary liability theories aren't new in 2011. * Ex Parte Seizures. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:47 am by Rosalind English
The Appeal  The main ground of appeal was based on the common law right of access to court, established in  Raymond v Honey [1983 1 AC.1, 13] and a series of pre Human Rights cases such as R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte Leech [1994] QB 198, and R (Anufrijeva) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] 1 AC 604 at 621[26]. [read post]