Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES " Results 8861 - 8880 of 9,857
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2012, 12:45 pm by Ilya Somin
He wrote well-known dissents in several previous cases striking down congressional laws on federalism grounds, including United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 6:33 pm by Guest Author for TradeSecretsLaw.com
By Justin Beyer In a matter of first impression, Judge William Standish of the Western District of Pennsylvania ruled in Best Medical Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
United States A Los Angeles businessman has been rewarded one of the largest Internet defamation awards ever. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:30 pm by Sarah Tate Chambers, Stephanie Zable
Superior Court has jurisdiction under the Stored Communications Act (SCA) because it is a “court of criminal jurisdiction of a State authorized by law of that State to issue search warrants. [read post]
1 May 2010, 11:37 pm by ZMan!
STRICT AND INTENSIVE SUPERVISION AND TREATMENT In the United States Supreme Court case of Kansas V. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:37 am by Margaret Taylor
Analysis As Marty Lederman and Robert Litt have pointed out, it has been the longstanding view of the Executive branch that this and similar statutes must be read to give the President the final word on whether and how classified information will be provided to the congressional intelligence committees. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am by INFORRM
(The claimant had relied on the requirements in Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 AC 167 at [19]). [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
CrimLaw’s response is pragmatic, and Robert Ambrogi urges lawyers to call a spade a spade. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 12:23 pm by Quinta Jurecic
Whereas the the Senate bill requests information on the special counsel investigation as a whole, the House bill has a more specific ask: Each report … shall include but not be limited to … any evidence of criminal activity that implicates the President, any person within the Executive Office of the President at the time of the report or any time prior, or any person appointed as an officer of the United States by the President (regardless of whether or not that… [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 9:53 am by William McGrath
These cases and other matters from the last month are discussed in greater detail after the jump.The SEC v. [read post]