Search for: "State v. David." Results 8861 - 8880 of 14,238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2011, 4:38 am by cdw
Finally, in  David Eugene Matthews  v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 1:07 pm by Amy Howe
Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971)Town of Greece v. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
David Mejias, Randi Milgrim, Katherine Lindo, and Ayesha Brantley, of Mejias, Milgrim & Alvarado, P.C., of Glen Cove, represented the wife. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
” Last week in the Courts On 2 February 2016 Sir David Eady heard applications in the case of Wasserman v Freilich. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
” At the ACS Blog, Bidish Sarma looks at Turner v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 6:35 am by James Bickford
  David Savage writes that “it will be hard to avoid controversy if [General Kagan] takes a clear stand on whether states can enforce their own tough immigration laws. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 9:36 am
At the moment, the law across Europe about how to decide what is and is not patentable is not settled, even though the same law should effectively apply in all member states of the EPC (comprising all 27 EU states together with a few other non-EU states). [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Terry, No. 150012/2012, Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:51 pm by Ben
 Last year, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided largely in favour of Mr. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:53 am
Lawson, 129 USPQ2d 1036 (TTAB 2018) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge David K. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
: Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (PatLit) Is it safe? [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 1:23 pm by David Kopel
As Cato's Executive Vice President David Boaz has long made clear, Cato hires on merit alone. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”The legislative initiative in Utah is supported by a broad coalition of business leaders and follows the September announcement by Republican David O. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 6:43 am
Senator David Shultheis opposes the measure on the grounds that it would benefit "promiscuous" women:"This stems from sexual promiscuity for the most part, and I just can't go there . . . . [read post]