Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 8861 - 8880
of 9,600
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2019, 11:14 am
United States,66 Buff. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 7:39 am
” On June 20, the day after he was informed he would not get the part-time job, the employee went to the doctor for his shoulder pain and received a note stating he should not work until being reevaluated on July 5. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 6:30 am
Rather, the trouble only began only after the doctoring of his FMLA form came to light via the third-party administrator. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
That includes United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 7:00 am
As I wrote last month in my post about the GPC v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:53 am
Remanding the case for trial, the court found the lower court erred in analyzing the evidence as if it were a pretext case, when it should have been analyzed as a qualified handicapped person case (Gannon v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 7:50 am
Clyde and Jackson v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 10:47 am
The decision is here: Barnes v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:12 pm
They wanted to submit a 14,000 signatures petition urging Russia to execute ECHR judgment Alekseyev v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 12:53 am
Supreme Court vacated the 2nd Circuit's ruling and instructed it to reconsider in light of its decision in Carey v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:45 am
The case is Universal Health Services v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:12 pm
They wanted to submit a 14,000 signatures petition urging Russia to execute ECHR judgment Alekseyev v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 9:25 am
You may seek advice from friends, or from your doctor, accountant, or another professional. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:00 am
Todd Hawkins et al. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 6:20 am
His ADA retaliation claim also failed (Rodrigo v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 2:45 pm
Only eighteen months ago, the Supreme Court in Burwell v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 4:15 am
Except the Third Circuit held this mortification to state a sufficient claim to go to trial in Revock v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 8:52 pm
In today’s case (Knauf v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 4:32 am
The amicus group say the State Board of Workers' Compensation had construed this language more liberally, and that the court "should have given them deference. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 3:59 pm
In the Pennsylvania case of Taylor v. [read post]
