Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 8861 - 8880
of 9,094
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Ct. 649 (2006), denial of habeas petition by district court is affirmed where the state courts did not unreasonably apply clearly established federal law. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 5:15 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 12:53 am
Supreme Court vacated the 2nd Circuit's ruling and instructed it to reconsider in light of its decision in Carey v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 2:10 pm
Hanson of the Iowa District Court, Polk County, ruled in Varnum v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 2:10 pm
Hanson of the Iowa District Court, Polk County, ruled in Varnum v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 10:22 am
" Ross Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 2:47 pm
In Sarl Louis Feraud International v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 11:50 am
Va. 1999) (granting motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim); Perry v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 9:01 pm
The Younger doctrine holds that "a federal court should not enjoin a pending state proceeding (including an administrative proceeding) that is judicial in nature and involves important state interests. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 11:02 am
Phillips v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:34 am
State v. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 7:22 pm
United States District Court. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 6:04 pm
United States District Court. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
The highest courts of many states have held precisely that. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 9:00 pm
District Court (W.D. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 9:41 am
Let us start today with an August 3, 2007 decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia -- the court that Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and John Roberts sat on before they were anointed to the Supreme Court as a reward for their reactionaryism -- in a case called Abigail Alliance For Better Access To Developmental Drugs v. von Eschenbach . [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 5:27 am
District Court Erred in Denying American Pipe Tolling to Individual Plaintiffs who had Filed Lawsuits Prior to Court Ruling on Class Certification Motion in Securities Class Action, because as Matter of First Impression Class Action Complaint Tolled Statute of Limitations even as to Claims by all Putative Class Members Regardless of Whether They had Filed Individual Lawsuits Second Circuit Holds Hundreds of individual and class action lawsuits were filed in… [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 3:39 am
SC06-2391 v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 9:15 pm
Like other rules that are "designed not merely to defeat the asserted claims, but to preclude judicial inquiry," Tenet v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 6:59 am
SC06-2391 v. [read post]
