Search for: "State v. Parks"
Results 8861 - 8880
of 11,306
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2010, 12:16 pm
Miller v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 10:37 am
As the Court observed in Haynes v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am
XX v HMRC (IP finance) United States US Patents ‘Sub-standard’ patents cost the US economy over $25 billion a year. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 6:33 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 4:33 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 1:34 pm
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm
Ag-Supply; Parke-Davis & Co. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 2:11 pm
Defendant contends that he was conducting a protest, but his 1st Amendment rights do not permit him to falsely report an impending fire (see Schenck v United States, 249 US 47, 52 [1919]).... [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 1:19 pm
Because it seems judges on the Maryland Court of Appeals are getting into the game.A reader dug up a case from this summer involving whether or not the state met the burden of proof necessary to show that a pot smoker “possessed” a blunt he wasn’t physically holding at the time.The court ruled that he did, and analogized the situation to a Cheech and Chong movie.I’m not sure if it was the decision or the dated reference which enraged the other side, but the… [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 1:10 pm
The CCA has previously held, in Briceno v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 12:53 pm
McDonell v New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, et al. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:42 am
Improvement Auth. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:22 am
” State v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:12 am
Police officers claim they were subjected to punishment after failing to meet their "traffic ticket quotas" Matarazzo v NYC Police Dept., 261 AD2d 142Section 215-a of the State Labor Law makes it unlawful to penalize an individual who fails to meet any quota related to the issuance of tickets or summonses written within a specified period of time for traffic violations. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:00 am
§ 16.2 The Difference Between Fiduciary Relationships and Confidential Relationships The Case: Foster Business Park, LLC. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 6:21 pm
Ryan v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:32 am
Judge William Alsup stated the United States Supreme Court 'has not yet made a clear ruling that admission of irrelevant or overtly prejudicial evidence constitutes a due process violation sufficient to warrant issuance of the writ.' Holley v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 2:31 pm
” Parham v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 6:00 am
In Rock Creek Park View LLC v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
Notes: the appellate court returned the case to the trial court with instructions to reconsider the career felon sentencing in light of Chambers v. the United States in which the Supreme Court ruled that a charge of escape was not a violent crime if it occurred merely by the failure to report to a prison. ? [read post]
