Search for: "True v True" Results 8861 - 8880 of 33,962
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2019, 3:50 pm by David Garcia and Melissa Gertler
nl_pk=44e1cfe8-1d78-4c79-ab63-b190fb389cc8&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=competition. [3] FTC et al. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 7:09 am by Frank C. Morris, Jr.
In a major decision sure to provoke controversy and legislative attempts to overrule it, the en banc Seventh Circuit, by a vote of 8 to 4, has held in Kleber v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 4:07 am
On the contrary, the Germans started employing new weapons of indiscriminate killing—V-1 and V-2 rockets. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 11:36 am by Jonathan Adler
The latter claim may well be true, but that’s not a reason to leave Auer undisturbed. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:01 am by Public Employment Law Press
Retaliation against an employee for reporting improper governmental action prohibited by Civil Service Law §75-b, the "Whistleblower Statute"Lilley v Greene Cent. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 3:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
A Michigan appellate court correctly enforces a Muslim couple's "mahr" agreement, entered at the time of the couple's marriage and calling for the husband to pay certain funds to the wife -- it's a valid contract, enforceable under secular law, regardless of its religious motivation.From Ali v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 3:11 pm
The English Patents Court recently handed down a decision granting Novartis a preliminary injunction to prevent infringement of its second medical use patent protecting sales of its breast cancer drug everolimus (marketed as Afinitor) - Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Limited v Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Limited [2019] EWHC 92 (Pat). [read post]