Search for: "Unit, Inc., Appeal of"
Results 8861 - 8880
of 13,897
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2012, 2:20 pm
E*Poly Star, Inc., 205 Cal. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 12:25 pm
It is uncertain whether the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals will uphold the 10% rule in Cambridge however other commentators have applauded the logic in the decision. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 10:14 am
New Life Art, Inc., No. 09-16412 (11th Cir. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 7:27 am
The plaintiff subsequently filed an appeal with the United States Court of Appeal for the Eleventh Circuit. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm
In contrast to the United States, treble (or multiple) damages are not available. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:18 pm
The Wisconsin District 3 Court of Appeals on Wednesday reversed a judgment in a breach-of-contract case involving United Concrete and Construction Inc., Appleton, and its concrete subcontractor, Red-D-Mix Concrete Inc., Green Bay. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 11:06 am
§ 1331 because the action arose under the laws of the United States including: the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:20 pm
Today the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit upheld two disclosure-related FEC rules. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 11:23 am
On appeal, the Second Circuit vacated the Order (discussed here). [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 7:03 am
FloorPro, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 4:14 pm
The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari today in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:40 am
The court of appeals was certainly not going to accept the Department’s position in the context of the HEA’s “substantial misrepresentation” language. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 9:30 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 12:02 pm
The case thus came before the Federal Circuit when R+L appealed the trial court’s dismissal of its claims. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:13 am
” California: On May 14, 2012, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California issued a lengthy decision (Vance’s Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 4:47 pm
The opinion in Campbell-Crane & Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 2:23 pm
The Court of Appeals remanded the case to consider whether the Association and MRA violated § 11-135(a)(4)(x) of the Maryland Condominium Act pertaining to disclosing whether the Association had “knowledge of any violation of the health or building codes with respect to the unit, the limited common elements assigned to the unit, or any other portion of the condominium. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm
American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:33 pm
Court of Appeals, D.C. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:33 pm
Court of Appeals, D.C. [read post]
