Search for: "Bills v. State"
Results 8881 - 8900
of 21,861
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2018, 8:49 am
When the court hears a second oral argument in Sturgeon v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:28 am
At Constitution Daily, Dawinder Sidhu explains why Holt v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 3:59 am
Kansas v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 11:55 am
State of California (2023) 89 Cal. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 7:30 am
For state politicians seeking to oppose this legislation, the strategy with the greatest likelihood of success is that enough state legislatures use their Article V power to propose an amendments convention to limit congressional power over health care that Congress is induced to repeal the bill. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 4:14 pm
In Salzberg v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 11:14 am
Hart In San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors Water Authority v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 9:11 am
Coalition Against Domestic Violence, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 8:25 am
John V. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 8:38 am
The case is US v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 5:59 am
Reg. 46,716-843 (Aug. 21, 2007)(to be codified at 37 C.F.R. pt. 1)(the "Final Rules") under his decision in Tafas v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 5:57 am
In Echols v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 6:12 am
Carters’ Argument When Ohio’s Good Samaritan statute was first enacted in 1963, the preamble to the bill clearly stated that its purpose was to provide immunity to physicians and nurses providing emergency treatment. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:34 pm
The effect of Article 15 can be seen in the ECJ decisions of SABAM v Scarlet and SABAM v Netlog prohibiting content filtering injunctions, and in Arnold J’s Cartier judgment itself:“If ISPs could be required to block websites without having actual knowledge of infringing activity, that would be tantamount to a general obligation to monitor. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:34 pm
The effect of Article 15 can be seen in the ECJ decisions of SABAM v Scarlet and SABAM v Netlog prohibiting content filtering injunctions, and in Arnold J’s Cartier judgment itself:“If ISPs could be required to block websites without having actual knowledge of infringing activity, that would be tantamount to a general obligation to monitor. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 1:28 pm
For employers negotiating class action settlements including attorneys’ fees, this ruling provides insight into the potential complications in dealing with fractured class counsel constituencies, and a reminder about the limits of federal courts’ willingness to enjoin parallel state court proceedings. ****** In Dakota Medical, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
See Dulong v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 7:54 am
Their claim was dismissed as moot, after the Ohio state legislature passed a bill changing vote-by-mail procedures in light of the coronavirus. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 7:54 am
Their claim was dismissed as moot, after the Ohio state legislature passed a bill changing vote-by-mail procedures in light of the coronavirus. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
PMS International Limited v Magmatic Limited | Loubutin case referred to the CJEU | German court refuses amendments filed on appeal | Italian Sharing Economy Bill | EPO Performance | IP in culinary recipes | Where has the patent troll gone? [read post]
