Search for: "Chief Justice of the United States" Results 8881 - 8900 of 14,935
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2014, 12:51 pm by Benjamin Wittes
  In the United States, courts have a well-established record of engaging in effective judicial review of sanctions decisions, and over time, have developed a (more-or-less) clear and stable set of legal rules regarding the requirements for the imposition of financial sanctions. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:09 am
  This is a topic remains a sensitive topic in India; one might draw at least weak parallels to sensitivity in the United States toward class issues. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:03 am by Lyle Denniston
Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for the dissenters, including Chief Justice John G. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:58 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 March 2014. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:27 am by Nietzer
Its grant was of fundamental importance to the constitutional development of England and to the rest of the common law world such as the United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 12:00 am by My name
[vi]          Chief Justice Roberts’ vote will likely be determinative in this case, as his vote was the swing vote in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 5:34 am
DEA head Michele Leonhart has not taken lightly the wave of added acceptance marijuana has received in recent years throughout various states in United States. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 6:42 am
Heads of state, chief justices, business leaders, public officials, and the press have cited the report. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 6:35 am by rainey Reitman
Book review and discussion questions for reading groups In No Place to Hide, Glenn Greenwald shows that a modern investigative reporter doesn’t just need the courage to take on the United States government and established media. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 6:22 am by Jag
  Rule 16.5  concerns defences, and states that a defendant must state which allegations he admits, denies, and is unable to admit or deny and requires the claimant to prove (a non-admission). [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 6:22 am by Jag
  Rule 16.5  concerns defences, and states that a defendant must state which allegations he admits, denies, and is unable to admit or deny and requires the claimant to prove (a non-admission). [read post]