Search for: "Federal, Inc." Results 8881 - 8900 of 57,615
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2020, 9:16 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch The court issued an important short-opinion, In re Ivantis, Inc. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 3:03 pm by Bill Marler
In 1998, in what was the first criminal conviction in a large-scale food-poisoning outbreak, Odwalla Inc. pleaded guilty to violating federal food safety laws and agreed to pay a $1.5 million fine for selling tainted apple juice that killed a 16-month-old girl and sickened 70 other people. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 1:41 pm by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., is getting attention for potentially “endangering” the practice of skinny labelling. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 5:54 am by kblocher@hslf.org
The poll was conducted by Mason-Dixon Polling & Strategy, Inc. of Jacksonville, Florida, between Oct. 12 and 15. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
 The Guardian had a piece “Key federal agency cleared of intimidating FOI website Right to Know”. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
After tentatively settling a class action alleging that Godiva Chocolates violated federal law by including too many credit card numerals on its receipts, the chocolatier catches a lucky break: The en banc Eleventh Circuit (over three lengthy dissents) throws out the case on standing grounds, concluding that this "bare procedural violation" is not sufficient to cause an injury under the Supreme Court's ruling in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 12:26 pm by Leonard L. Gordon and Michael A. Munoz
District Court for the Central District of California issued a tentative preliminary injunction against GolfzonDeca, Inc. for marketing its GolfBuddy rangefinder. [read post]
The EO prohibits the use by federal contractors or subcontractors, and certain federal grantees, of training materials that “inculcate[ ] in its employees any form of race or sex stereotyping or any form of race or sex scapegoating. [read post]
In support, McFerran cited numerous NLRB and federal court decisions affirming and applying existing Board precedent, including 12 NLRB decisions since the 2010 Eliason decision where the NLRB has declared stationary banners or inflatables lawful under the Act. [read post]