Search for: "State v. Doctor" Results 8881 - 8900 of 9,600
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2008, 9:34 pm
Several of the anonymous commenters stated that they were, for example, co-workers of the plaintiff or of the doctor against whom the plaintiff complained. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 3:05 pm
In his case, the state courts relied upon a doctor’s testimony that a mentally retarded person is one who cannot use a telephone, cannot go to the bathroom, and cannot eat or dress himself. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 2:52 am
If you are not sure when you will be out of the pre-existing condition/"look back" period, consult with an attorney before stopping work.Copyright (c) 2008 by John V. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 8:01 am
Fact witnesses were able to show failure to comply with professional standard of care, and jury could disbelieve defense experts, in United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 8:30 pm
" A detailed initial conversation will accomplish several things: 1) Make sure you know every doctor the client has visited. 2) Make sure the client trusts the firm by demonstrating attention to detail. 3) Make sure that there are no other potentially liable parties and that any necessary ante-litem notices are sent out. 4) Make sure that you are aware of any and all prior injury claims and explain that the Defense has access to the ISO index claims database. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 2:25 am
State legislators passed a law that capped non-economic damages, such as pain and suffering, in medical malpractice suits to $500,000 for doctors and $1 million for hospitals in 2005. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 8:50 am
That is why, for example, pro-life advocates rarely wish to punish women for abortions (as opposed to doctors), even though these women are hiring strangers to kill their children. [read post]