Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 8881 - 8900 of 9,094
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2007, 11:48 pm
On October 3rd of this year, the Supreme Court will entertain arguments is New York State Board of Elections v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 2:33 am
Cardiff Magistrates’ Court [2007] EWHC 1846 (Admin) “Where a district judge had decided a preliminary issue as to jurisdiction his ruling could properly be challenged by way of case stated or judicial review. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
It also remanded the case for an evidentiary hearing regarding Getsy's claim of judicial bias against the state trial-court judge. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 12:57 am
District Court Judge Henry Hudson set a trial date of Nov. 26 at Vick's arraignment. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
Lueck, 471 U.S. 202, 212-13 & n.6 (1985) (multi-factor judicial test).Malone v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 5:27 pm
To be sure, in United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 3:15 pm
In re Metoprolol Succinate Patent Litigation, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 06-1254. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:24 am
Federal Court Declines to Relieve Attorneys in KPMG Case New York Law Journal Southern District of New York Judge Lewis A. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 8:57 am
" The city noted that the panel had acknowledged that its ruling conflicts with decisions "of most other federal courts of appeals, many State courts, and the highest local court in this jurisdiction, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 5:16 am
Per my index, they new kids on the block disagreed in only four cases: United Haulers, Zuni Public School District, Watters v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 8:48 am
In addition, the FJC researchers seem to believe that filing in federal court in the first place gives the plaintiff's lawyer some control over forum selection.I'm not so sure. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 2:18 am
The court held a sealed hearing as to the proceedings taking place in the State Bar of Arkansas. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 2:40 pm
Supp. 51 (D.D.C. 1973) (holding that the $10,000 jurisdictional amount in controversy requirement then in the statute (it's since been eliminated) was not satisfied); United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 2:00 am
"Although Hofer was decided by a panel of the appellate from the Fifth District, not the First District, where the Circuit Court of Cook County is located, that is of no consequence . . . [read post]