Search for: "IN RE GRANT" Results 8901 - 8920 of 37,625
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2019, 10:22 am by David M. Ward
If you decide you’re not ready for it, put your notes aside and flesh out another project. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 7:18 am
Indeed, it follows from the answer to the first part of the plea in law that the relevant evidence is only that which shows the mark at issue in its registered form or, failing that, in forms which are broadly equivalent, which excludes forms of use where the colour scheme is reversed or which fail to respect the other essential characteristics of the mark at issue.It then recalled the principles established in earlier case law re acquired distinctiveness, and reviewed the evidence… [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Since then, there is this example of critically important mobile phone tower tracking evidence that was the basis of a conviction for second degree murder at a first trial, later found to be faulty before the re-trial: R. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 10:35 am by Emily Coward
Is it reasonable that he’s afraid of them because they’re a black male outside wearing a baseball cap that happens to be red? [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 9:57 am by Caroline Lee
(b) [“The governing body [of each county in the State] shall provide for the number, compensation, tenure, and appointment of employees”]; In re Work Uniform Cases (2005) 133 Cal.App.4th 328, 335, 342, 345 [explaining that article XI, section 1 of the California Constitution exempted two general law counties from claims for reimbursement under Labor Code section 2802].)(6) (Marquez, supra, 32 Cal.App.5th at p. 556.)(7) (Ibid.)(8) (Cal. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 7:10 am by Ben
A copyright was granted for the same in 1997. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 6:42 am by Francis Pileggi
., No. 281, 2018 (Jan. 29, 2019), Delaware’s High Court addressed a demand under Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) Section 220 by a stockholder for corporate books and records, including emails among management, to allow the stockholder to investigate possible wrongdoing, such as the reasons behind amendments to an Investors’ Rights Agreement that severely reduced the original rights granted under that agreement. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:23 am by Florian Mueller
The key to this result was that the appeals court concluded Apple's initial defense (we're basically talking about the answer to the complaint) was good enough that Qualcomm would have had to do more to prove an infringement. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 6:43 pm by Scott McKeown
(here)  Or, patent owners trying to return to court on claims that re indistinguishable to cancelled claims. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 2:17 pm by Erik J. Heels
As such, we have rarely done copyright work for our clients, not because we’re not good at it, but because we feel that it is money that is not well spent. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:15 pm by Jonathan Bailey
Granted, a scenario such as this is unlikely for someone doing this. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:07 pm by Vishnu Kannan
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Tuesday, June 18, 2019, 10:00 a.m.: The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) will host an event titled “Sustainable Development Goal #16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:17 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The district court granted Spigen summary judgment and the court of appeals affirmed, saying some things about registration. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 7:33 am by Jessica Kroeze
Claim 1 of the main request, i.e. the patent as granted, reads as follows:"System for dehumidifying walls that comprises at least one apparatus (2) for dehumidifying walls that incorporates:- wall-dehumidifying means (3) that is active for promoting the dehumidification of at least a portion of wall, and- at least a control unit (4) that is active on said wall-dehumidifying means (3) to enable operation to be monitored,the apparatus (2) further comprising at least a communication… [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Using that power, the trial court here did grant the plaintiff’s request to have the employer provide anti-harassment training. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
AG Kokott provides some indications | Pepper gets spicy: The EPO President's Referral to the EBA | Book review: Accords de technologie / Technology Transactions | More Than Just a Game V - IP and the gaming industry | Event report: Retromark – the conference | Re-imagining Marie Louise Fuller's copyright of dance in Fuller v Bemis | Conference report: 'Injunctions and flexibility in patent law' | DSM Directive Series #3: How far does Article 14 go? [read post]