Search for: "In re Reader"
Results 8901 - 8920
of 29,722
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Readers of this Blog will remember the case involving Portsmouth landlady Karen Murphy which established that individuals living in the UK are allowed to use digiboxes which provide authorised services from other EU member states to watch Premier League football in the UK However this case did not extent such a right to commercial premises.A Premier League spokesman said: "The courts granted the judgment following failure by the defendants to engage in the case, despite several… [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 3:54 am
If this content is not in your news reader, it means the page you are viewing infringes copyright. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 11:11 pm
Facebook Product manager Josh Roberts said in a blog post: Media organizations and journalists are an integral part of Facebook, and we’re committed to delivering products that will create the best experience for publishers and their readers. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 2:28 pm
If you’re in one of the affected jurisdictions, you have presumably heard about the upcoming test already. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:06 am
Even we here in the CommLawBlog bunker have devoted considerable attention to the topic (although we’re trying to get our readers used to the proper terminology: as far as the FAA is concerned, we should refer to “Unmanned Aircraft Systems”, or “UASs”, not to “drones”). [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:44 am
Six of the unconfirmed nominations, however, involved individuals who subsequently were re-nominated and confirmed. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 5:13 am
He used to be Harvard’s head honcho, which is a pretty cool thing to be if you’re of that ilk. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 3:03 am
If this content is not in your news reader, it means the page you are viewing infringes copyright. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:55 pm
Reader TarlsQtr noted an important article in the Weekly Standard, but did not get the chance to do so until far down the thread of an earlier post by Kent. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm
The Grand Chamber emphasised the professional running and commercial character of the news platform at issue, together with the clearly unlawful content of the readers’ comments as decisive arguments in order to justify the finding of the liability of the internet news portal for their readers’ offending comments. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 9:53 am
But we’re concerned that AWS has not gone far enough. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:26 am
” Our team will continue to follow these developments and update our readers as they unfold. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:01 am
An appellate court may re-examine the Highbury Estates decision in the future. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 4:32 am
If this content is not in your news reader, it means the page you are viewing infringes copyright. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 3:45 am
If this content is not in your news reader, it means the page you are viewing infringes copyright. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 1:25 pm
An article from the 2006 Smithsonian is re-appearing on the net, including the textOne aspect of this multidimensional man that probably doesn't occur to anyone other than avid readers of Lincoln biographies (and Smithsonian) is that of inventor. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 8:42 am
Rather than speaking in ridiculously oblique terms about the tools I'm using and the products we're building at my firm, and getting much the same from friends and colleagues (and readers of this blog) at other law firms, I now get to roll up my sleeves and work side by side with some of the smartest and most interesting people in the legal industry to create new and innovative products and services. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 4:35 am
If this content is not in your news reader, it means the page you are viewing infringes copyright. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 3:29 am
If you are principled, you’re on your own. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:05 pm
We’re somewhere below toenail fungus & Lady Gaga. [read post]
