Search for: "Mark" Results 8901 - 8920 of 151,849
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2023, 8:22 am by Marcel Pemsel
Affixing SPAR’s trade mark was not considered sufficient to exclude a link between Jägermeister’s well-known trade marks and the contested trade dress for two reasons: First, SPAR’s trade mark is not a dominant element. [read post]
31 May 2024, 12:02 pm by Alessandro Cerri
 The Opposition was based on Article 8(1)(b) of the EU Trade Mark Regulation 2017/1001 (EUTMR), namely that that the mark applied for shall not be registered if it is identical or similar to an earlier trade mark registered in respect of identical/similar goods and services, and there exists a likelihood of confusion. [read post]
3 Sep 2022, 6:57 am by Nedim Malovic
In relation to the mark applied for, the elements ‘tiger’ and ‘cat’ are readily identifiable within that mark, given that those two words have a clear meaning for the English-speaking public. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 3:15 am
The Board concluded, not surprisingly, that both the applied-for mark and the cited mark are dominated by the word LAROQUE. [read post]
11 May 2018, 6:00 am by Kyle Kroll
On the one hand, the marks free ride on the notoriety of other marks, bringing attention. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 11:28 am by Felicia Boyd (US)
Instead, a party must show priority in the family of marks and that the marks were promoted together to create consumer recognition of the common element in the family of marks. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 11:28 am by Felicia Boyd (US)
Instead, a party must show priority in the family of marks and that the marks were promoted together to create consumer recognition of the common element in the family of marks. [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:32 am by Neil Wilkof
Introduction of new forms of trademarksIn line with the Directive, the Law introduces all the new forms of trademarks provided in the Directive, such as hologram marks, motion marks, multimedia marks and pattern marks, abolishing at the same time the requirement of graphic representation. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 3:22 am
Applicant contended that the distinctive term KOTA (having no known meaning on the record) is the dominant element of the mark and therefore the mark as a whole does not violate Section 2(e)(3). [read post]
30 May 2017, 2:58 am
" The Board had found that respondent's mark was not likely to cause confusion with petitioner's registered mark INSIGNIA for wines. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 2:11 am
  Nor was there any taking advantage of the Intra-Presse mark. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 3:24 am
Light Shine Media Group, LLC, Cancellation No. 92061045 [Petition to cancel a registration for the mark GOODLIVING for "General feature magazines" on the ground of likelihood of confusion with petitioner's common law rights in the mark GOOD LIVING for, inter alia, on-line non-downloadable general feature magazines]. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 3:45 am
The Marks: Applicant argued that the word VIVA dominates its mark and makes the marks different in sound and appearance. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 4:07 am
" The Board concluded that SAGE CENTRAL "is less conceptually strong than an arbitrary mark. but suggestive marks are inherently distinctive and entitled to protection. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm
The Apple US marks were registered on the basis of evidence of use since 2006. [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:23 am
June 4, 2019 - 1 PM: In re Christine Schiefer, Serial No. 87737157 [Refusal to register the mark shown immediately below, for "On-line retail store featuring apparel, glassware, stoneware and accessory items for the consumption of alcoholic beverages," on the ground that applicant's specimens of use fail to show the applied-for mark used as a service mark for the recited services]. [read post]