Search for: "Opened in Error" Results 8901 - 8920 of 10,828
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2010, 7:10 am by Andrew Dickinson
 Those efforts proved futile, doing little more than opening what the former Vice-President of the European Commission, Franco Frattini, described with a classical nod as la boîte de Pandore (an expression that appears more earthily in the English translation of the Parliamentary debate as “a can of worms”). [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 2:10 pm by Wells Bennett
Back to Ryan, who asks about the vulnerabilities of open networks which counsel now use. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 7:55 am
Suffice it to say that some evidence rulings that are wrong may be viewed as prejudicial and as warranting a reversal, while most are considered by the appellate courts as "harmless error. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 7:51 am by Bright!Tax Writers
Over 9 million Americans have chosen to embrace the adventure of a lifetime – living abroad. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:21 am
Appeal by mother against refusal to re-open fact-finding inquiry. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 4:07 pm
  Another, following on the first, is AI's embrace of often crude anti-Israel biases that have led to what can only be called factual errors in its reporting and beyond-dubious legal standards and international law interpretations. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 2:37 pm by Lazar Radic
Despite some 11th hour efforts by their sponsors, neither the American Innovation and Choice Online Act, nor the Open App Markets Act, nor the Journalism Competition and Preservation Act made the cut to be included in the $1.7 trillion, 4,155-page omnibus bill that will be the last vote taken by the 117th Congress. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 11:45 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Thus, the policy of “opening up” and of “normalcy” amounts in practice to excluding tens of millions of people from many jobs and stores. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
To me that suggests a strong desire (by at least four Justices—the number needed to grant review) to correct error by the Sixth Circuit. [read post]
The opening of an expert phase at the appellate level is uncommon, and was a first indicator of the prima facie errors of fact and law that had flawed the first instance decision. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 12:17 am by Steve Lubet
” A prosecutor pondering an indictment would have to worry about whether he could satisfy that requirement beyond a reasonable doubt, which remains an open question. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 7:59 am by admin
  Because demand shifts faster than supply, and both move much faster than government, a gap will open up. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 8:21 am by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 5/506(a)(2) What if the Guardian Ad Litem’s report is riddled with errors which the judge refuses to acknowledge? [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 2:56 pm by familoo
Fortunately this liberates me somewhat from having to fillet the judgment, as it’s already been done (god sorry, another food metaphor) and leaves the field wide open for unstructured ranting. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 2:33 pm by Juan Antunez
Because the testator will not be available to correct any errors that the attorney may have made when the will is offered for probate, a client is especially dependent upon an attorney’s advice and professional skill when they consult an attorney to have a will drawn. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
First, the Fifth Circuit’s approach is open to seemingly arbitrary outcomes. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:36 am by The Legal Blog
There can be no disagreement with this part of the submission but the question is when the person who has given his evidence on affidavit appears in court, whether it is also open to the accused to insist that before cross-examining him as to the facts stated in the affidavit he must first depose in examination-in-chief and be required to verbally state what is already said in the affidavit. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm
Thus while some statutory terms are open to interpretation and construction, others — such as the numerical thresholds at issue in UARG are not. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 9:25 am by Don Cruse
As it did in June, the Court concluded that the trial court had made an error when it struck the State's expert witness on the question of damages. [read post]