Search for: "People v Long"
Results 8901 - 8920
of 18,905
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2016, 2:33 pm
The government faced an uphill battle in Wednesday’s argument in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:26 am
The other day we - allegedly belatedly - posted about the Supreme Court's decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 2:04 pm
This doctrine has long been used to invalidate laws that ostensibly favor women but are based on, and perpetuate, sex-based norms of proper behavior; and at least two cases, Ivey v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Wade, Lawrence v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:45 am
Any other result would let someone commit cybercrimes with complete impunity, as long as they targeted people in another country. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 3:39 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 10:01 am
FWIW, I have occasionally had people complain about my on [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
Under U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 9:36 am
He lamented the uncertainty created by the US Supreme Court's odd ruling in US v. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 11:29 pm
Fernandez v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court wrote its Hollingsworth v. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 7:55 am
But on the long list of To-Dos, after buy more Cheddar Bunnies, most people do not have “File baby’s name as a trade mark with the USPTO”. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
In those two cases, none of the patent-holders contributed anything to the economic development of the highly profitable products that were created by thousands of other people and the amount of money demanded as damages in those two cases bore no reasonable relationship to the inventor's alleged contribution to those products.The Eolas and Blackberry cases are prime evidence of patent law run wild - a development which has not escaped the notice of the US Supreme Court, whose decision… [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 7:36 am
Things didn’t work because the people at the top didn’t want them to work. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 6:25 am
Today's Hindu carries an op-ed by Vishnu V. [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 2:36 pm
Better than on the field of battle, I'd think.Trilink Saw Chain, LLC v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 11:09 pm
Supreme Court ruling in the case of Employment Division v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 7:07 am
Tuesday’s argument in McFadden v. [read post]
