Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 8901 - 8920
of 21,158
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2011, 7:33 am
If you care about the startup company ecosystem, I encourage you to give this question some thought and write the SEC. [1]Persons covered include (i) the issuer, (ii) any predecessor of the issuer; (iii) any affiliated issuer; (iv) any director, officer, general partner or managing member of the issuer; (v) any beneficial owner of 10% or more of any class of the issuer’s equity securities; (vi) any promoter connect with the issuer in any capacity at the time of such sale;… [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 8:29 am
The amendment removed the general home inspection contingency and reduced the sale price. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 8:29 am
The amendment removed the general home inspection contingency and reduced the sale price. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 12:40 pm
" The Tenth Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 8:56 am
If the parties wished to bind Lexington to past practice, then their License Agreement should have expressly stated so. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:04 pm
The recent case of Asda Stores Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council [2007,] concerned the interpretation of a number of provisions in the Food Safety (General Food Hygiene) Regulations 1995 (“the Regulations”), which implemented Council Directive (EC) 93/43. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:00 pm
In Brooks Cotton Co. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 2:41 am
In Occidental Chemical Corporation v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:05 pm
The recent case of Asda Stores Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council [2007,] concerned the interpretation of a number of provisions in the Food Safety (General Food Hygiene) Regulations 1995 (“the Regulations”), which implemented Council Directive (EC) 93/43. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 8:20 pm
The recent case of Asda Stores Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council [2007,] concerned the interpretation of a number of provisions in the Food Safety (General Food Hygiene) Regulations 1995 (“the Regulations”), which implemented Council Directive (EC) 93/43. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 9:04 pm
The recent case of Asda Stores Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council [2007,] concerned the interpretation of a number of provisions in the Food Safety (General Food Hygiene) Regulations 1995 (“the Regulations”), which implemented Council Directive (EC) 93/43. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 3:52 pm
Office of the State's Attorney of Cooke County. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 9:49 am
This statute has been held invalid (see Lett v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:13 pm
United States, 434 F.3d 1359, 1368 (Fed. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:39 am
The following criminal cases of note were decided this week: Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court: State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 1:37 pm
Do Denim v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 3:15 am
In Woods and MEC v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:03 am
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:48 pm
Schooner Harbor Ventures, Inc. v. [read post]
