Search for: "State v. Doctor" Results 8901 - 8920 of 9,600
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 pm
In "Ex Parte Talks Allowed Under Georgia Law For Counsel, Doctors Preempted by HIPAA" (password required), the United States Law Week discusses in detail Moreland v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 7:50 pm
USC debacle, and until today,  missed the Court of Appeal's decision in Conte v. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 11:48 pm
Furthermore, the prescribing of Crestor for anything other than lowering high LDL's is an off-label use and more research is needed before doctors can be justified in changing the standards of care. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 4:19 pm
  The effort to set up a test case to challenge Roe v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 10:19 pm
Each state has different rules.In New York, as it happens, our highest court dealt with the subject this year in Bernstein v Penny Whistle Toys, Inc. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 7:38 pm
The jury instruction stated: A doctor is not necessarily negligent because the physician errs in judgment or because efforts prove unsuccessful. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:07 am
The Court concludes therefore that there is insufficient evidence to show general causation.Federal and State Courts have consistently determined that the cause or causes of MCS (IEI) cannot be reliably established by scientific proof (see, e.g., Oppenheimer v United Charities of NY, 266 AD2d 116, 698 NYS2d 144 [1st Dept 1999]; Frank v State of New York, 972 F Supp 130 [ND NY 1997]). [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
After its February 2008 decision in Riegel v. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 1:11 pm
Compare that to state court where a jury would get to hear from you and your doctors in a real trial if you have bought your own insurance from a local insurance agent outside of work. [read post]