Search for: "Still v. Justice Court"
Results 8901 - 8920
of 19,630
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2015, 1:23 pm
On Tuesday, the Court set aside seventy-five minutes to explore Montgomery v. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 2:44 am
I still am. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
But some scholars argue that the justices are still not in agreement about the scope of the major questions doctrine. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 4:18 am
” In another Monday ruling, the court held in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 9:29 am
In some ways, the recent Supreme Court of Canada decision in Alberta v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 4:04 pm
In the case of Adkins v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 7:43 pm
Would you rather that the Court speak to the world on questions of racial justice, or to schoolchildren in Topeka? [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:52 pm
In case you haven’t already heard… Yesterday, the Supreme Court issued an opinion in the Microsoft v. i4i case which has been one of the most closely watched cases on the Supreme Court’s docket during this term. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 8:31 pm
The Court in Carter v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 5:16 am
Cisse (1), 2013 WL 4822851 (Ohio Court of Appeals 2013). [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:00 pm
When the Litter Sisters case, and others, reached the Supreme Court, under the name Zubik v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 10:34 am
In yesterday’s case, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal was granted, particularly in relation to the issue of backdated holiday pay, although a reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union was refused. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 1:29 pm
This large pool of panel members ensures that more soldiers are actively involved in the military justice system, and that the military justice system in V Corps is as representative of the community as possible, while still adhering to the high standards of having the best qualified panel members under Article 25, UCMJ. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:38 pm
The Court then overturned the SRA in 2005 in Booker v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 8:31 am
"We want everyone in the criminal justice system to come together and start a dialogue to see if the implications after Strickland are still working today. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:47 am
In Rehberg v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 7:13 am
” At The Volokh Conspiracy, Josh Blackman discusses the prospect that, with the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump still going on, some or all justices may not attend tonight’s State of the Union address. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 8:35 pm
Back in 2012, Supreme Court ruled that the mandate is constitutional in its highly controversial decision in NFIB v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 8:05 pm
" Justice Roberts, in his concurring opinion last month in Salazar v. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm
The Full Court in Black and Black had rejected Justice Benjamin's view that substantial compliance was sufficient. [read post]
