Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 8941 - 8960
of 13,916
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm
La. 2010); Gelber v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 5:06 pm
As a result, all such administrative judges appointed since 2000 have been named by the Director of the Patent and Trademark Office, but the Director is not the Head of a Department (since he serves under the Commerce Secretary). [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 3:05 am
GermanyUser v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 12:24 pm
Castellanos v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:03 pm
If a Republican dominated Supreme Court overrules Roe v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 11:16 am
The results of the snap (40 hour) poll of readers indicated that, of 128 respondents, 126 stated that they were unable to view either of the images which the Court of First Instance was comparing in Case T-307/08 Aldi Einkauf v OHIM. [read post]
11 May 2022, 5:01 am
The Court held in Skinner v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:36 pm
Kagan's 1st oral argument before the Court came last September in Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:12 am
Alesi, United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 1:55 pm
App. 2015) (trial court did not err in admitting EDR evidence provided by law enforcement officer who was qualified as an expert in accident reconstruction); Commonwealth v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 9:54 am
The Obama Administration has the options of asking the en banc Circuit Court to rehear the case, or asking the Supreme Court to review it. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 1:55 pm
Patent Office. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 10:34 am
A Recent Judgment on the Irish Workplace Dispute Resolution System In Zalewski v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 2:19 am
., Inc. v County of Montgomery, 57 AD3d 1061 Cathy Anderson and Grace De Waal Malefyt each worked for a period of time in the title of "part-time" correction officer in Montgomery County. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 9:33 am
Tuschman for this post, which was originally published on EBG’s Florida Employment & Immigration Law Blog] An employee claiming Whistleblower protection under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act must have actually believed that his company’s conduct was illegal in order to state a claim under the Act, according to a recent decision by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, Gale v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 5:33 am
Tuschman for this post, which was originally published on EBG’s Florida Employment & Immigration Law Blog] An employee claiming Whistleblower protection under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act must have actually believed that his company’s conduct was illegal in order to state a claim under the Act, according to a recent decision by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, Gale v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 7:48 pm
Circuit decision you mentioned, FEC v. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 2:02 pm
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 10:03 am
The billboards were first ordered removed in December 2005, when the Indiana Supreme Court ruled that a county ordinance was passed in time, during the administration of then-Mayor Bart Peterson, to prevent Pinnacle Media from erecting the signs. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 9:58 pm
Bromfield v. [read post]
